Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Agonist mediated internalization of M2 mAChR is β-arrestin-dependent

Journal of Molecular Signaling volume 1, Article number: 7 (2006) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) undergo agonist-promoted internalization, but evidence suggesting that the mechanism of internalization is β-arrestin dependent has been contradictory and unclear. Previous studies using heterologous over-expression of wild type or dominant-negative forms of β-arrestins have reported that agonist-promoted internalization of M2 mAChRs is a β-arrestin- and clathrin-independent phenomenon. In order to circumvent the complications associated with the presence of endogenous β-arrestin that may have existed in these earlier studies, we examined agonist-promoted internalization of the M2 mAChR in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) derived from β-arrestin knockout mice that lack expression of either one or both isoforms of β-arrestin (β-arrestin 1 and 2).

Results

In wild type MEF cells transiently expressing M2 mAChRs, 40% of surface M2 mAChRs underwent internalization and sorted into intracellular compartments following agonist stimulation. In contrast, M2 mAChRs failed to undergo internalization and sorting into intracellular compartments in MEF β-arrestin double knockout cells following agonist stimulation. In double knockout cells, expression of either β-arrestin 1 or 2 isoforms resulted in rescue of agonist-promoted internalization. Stimulation of M2 mAChRs led to a stable co-localization with GFP-tagged β-arrestin within endocytic structures in multiple cell lines; the compartment to which β-arrestin localized was determined to be the early endosome. Agonist-promoted internalization of M2 mAChRs was moderately rescued in MEF β-arrestin 1 and 2 double knockout cells expressing exogenous arrestin mutants that were selectively defective in interactions with clathrin (β-arrestin 2 ΔLIELD), AP-2 (β-arrestin 2-F391A), or both clathrin/AP-2. Expression of a truncated carboxy-terminal region of β-arrestin 1 (319–418) completely abrogated agonist-promoted internalization of M2 mAChRs in wild type MEF cells.

Conclusion

In summary, this study demonstrates that agonist-promoted internalization of M2 mAChRs is β-arrestin- and clathrin-dependent, and that the receptor stably co-localizes with β-arrestin in early endosomal vesicles.

Background

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors belong to the superfamily of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) that are commonly expressed in a variety of tissues and are classified into five known subtypes (M1 -M5 mAChR). M1, M3, and M5 mAChRs are selectively coupled to Gq proteins while M2 and M4 mAChRs are linked to Gi/G0 proteins [1, 2]. M2 mAChRs are the primary muscarinic subtype in the heart where their stimulation leads to the regulation of myocardial contractility [3]. As with other GPCRs, M2 mAChR activity is tightly regulated by desensitization and internalization. These regulatory mechanisms are typically associated with receptor phosphorylation followed by either recycling or down-regulation [4–9].

Desensitization is a complex process that involves agonist-dependent phosphorylation at specific serine/threonine residues by G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) followed by β-arrestin binding. Two widely expressed isoforms of β-arrestin (1 and 2) are known to be involved in uncoupling receptors from their cognate G-proteins thereby attenuating receptor signalling [10, 11]. Typically, agonist-induced phosphorylation facilitates receptor internalization, which serves to either resensitize or down-regulate desensitized receptors [12]. β-arrestins have been shown to facilitate internalization by directly interacting with the β2 subunit of the clathrin-AP2 (adaptor protein 2) complex and clathrin itself [11, 13]. Thus, β-arrestins can induce receptor sequestration by directly interacting with the endocytic machinery. Many receptors such as the prototypic β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) internalize in a clathrin and β-arrestin dependent fashion. Hence, β-arrestin facilitates clathrin-mediated endocytosis [11, 13].

In addition to desensitization and internalization, β-arrestins are known to play a role in other cellular processes that include intracellular trafficking and signalling [12]. Association of β-arrestin with agonist-occupied receptors has been shown to initiate intracellular signalling by functioning as an assembly site for signalling components such as Src, JNK3, and ERK1/2 [14–17]. Therefore, β-arrestin-receptor complexes can lead to cytosolic retention and activation of signalling molecules following receptor-mediated signalling at the cell surface. The physiological roles of this process include decreasing cell proliferation and regulating cytoskeletal rearrangements by spatially restricting ERK activation to the cytosol [16, 18]. Recent reports have also suggested that β-arrestins can function at post-endocytic stages to regulate receptor sorting. It has been shown that receptors exhibit differential affinities for β-arrestin and therefore are classified into two groups [19]. Class A receptors (including β2AR and dopamine receptors) are thought to interact with β-arrestin at the plasma membrane but immediately disassociate following localization to clathrin-coated pits. Hence receptors enter early endosomes devoid of β-arrestin and are typically resensitized and rapidly recycled [20]. In contrast, Class B receptors (vasopressin-V2R, angiotensin-AT1AR, and neurotensin receptors) stably associate with β-arrestin so that β-arrestin/receptor complexes remain intact and are internalized into juxtanuclear endosomal compartments [21]. This interaction can persist for prolonged periods of time. This stable association may dictate the kinetics of receptor recycling since AT1AR and V2R recycle very slowly [20, 21]. A functional consequence of β-arrestin association may also be to facilitate receptor down-regulation.

The role of β-arrestins in regulating the trafficking of M2 mAChRs has been contradictory and unclear. Reports have demonstrated that phosphorylation by GRK2 on serine/threonine residues in the third intracellular loop of M2 mAChRs recruits β-arrestin and leads to receptor desensitization and subsequent internalization [7].

Whether β-arrestin is involved directly in agonist-promoted endocytosis of M2 mAChRs remains unclear. Indeed over-expression of β-arrestin has been reported to increase agonist-promoted internalization of M2 mAChRs but not of M1 or M3 mAChRs [22]. Furthermore, Claing et al. have shown that M2 mAChRs internalize in a dynamin- and β-arrestin-insensitive manner when expressed in HEK293 cells [23]. Others have reported that the Arf6 GTPase (ADP-ribosylation factor 6) facilitates M2 mAChR entry into primary vesicles, which fuse with clathrin-derived early endosomes [24, 25]. These data do not necessarily rule out β-arrestin as a regulator in agonist-promoted endocytosis of M2 mAChRs. Therefore, to clarify whether agonist-promoted internalization of M2 mAChRs is arrestin dependent, we utilized mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) derived from β-arrestin null mice that lack expression of one or both isoforms (β-arrestin 1 and 2) and their wild type littermates as control cells [26]. Here we report that agonist-promoted internalization of M2 mAChRs is β-arrestin dependent and M2 mAChRs form stable complexes with β-arrestin at the early endosome. Furthermore, we demonstrate that agonist-promoted internalization of M2 mAChRs is clathrin-dependent. These results suggest that β-arrestin plays an important role in regulating M2 mAChR activity.

Results

To determine whether the MEF cells used in this study expressed endogenous mAChRs, we performed RT-PCR aimed at detecting mRNA encoding M1, M2 and M4 mAChR subtypes. As positive controls, we used postnatal rat cerebellum tissue for M2 mAChR mRNA and postnatal rat cortical tissue for M1 and M4 mAChR mRNA. RT-PCR analysis clearly demonstrated that MEF wild type as well as MEF double knockout cells (MEF KO1/2) did not express mRNA encoding M1, M2, or M4 mAChR subtypes (Fig. 1). Accordingly, radioligand-binding assays also confirmed that MEF wild type as well as MEF KO1/2 did not express mAChRs at any detectable level (data not shown). Therefore, we concluded that MEF cells do not express endogenous mAChRs.

Figure 1
figure 1_7

Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) cells do not express mRNA encoding M 1 , M 2 or M 4 mAChR subtypes. A representative gel showing lack of mAChR expression in MEF wild type and KO1/2 cells Lanes consisted of 100 bp ladder (lane 1), wild type MEF cells (lanes 2, 5, 8 and 11), MEF β-arrestin KO1/2 (lanes 3, 6, 9, and 12), rat cortex (lanes 4 and 10 and 13), and rat cerebellum (lane 7). The white arrows point to M1, M2 and M4 mAChR PCR product from cDNA as positive controls. The electrophoresis gel shown is a representative of at least 3 independent experiments.

Full size image

To examine whether ectopically expressed M2 mAChRs undergo agonist-promoted internalization in MEFs, we transiently transfected MEF wild type and corresponding β-arrestin null cells with a plasmid encoding a FLAG-tagged porcine M2 mAChR. Following 24 h transfection, MEF wild type, MEF KO1, MEF KO2, and MEF KO1/2 cells were stimulated with 1 mM carbachol for 1 h at 37°C. The number of receptors remaining at the cell surface was measured using a saturating concentration of the hydrophilic ligand [3H]-NMS. Approximately 40% of surface M2 mAChRs were internalized in wild type MEF cells while M2 mAChRs in MEF KO1 and MEF KO2 cells were internalized by 33% and 42%, respectively. In contrast, M2 mAChRs were not internalized in MEF KO1/2 (Fig. 2A). These results demonstrated that exogenously expressed M2 mAChRs undergo agonist-promoted internalization in MEF wild type cells and either β-arrestin isoform was sufficient for sequestration. To further evaluate where M2 mAChRs were localized, we used confocal immunofluorescence microscopy in MEF wild type or MEF KO1/2 cells transiently expressing a FLAG-tagged M2 mAChR in the absence or presence of carbachol. As indicated in Figure 2B, diffuse cell surface localization of M2 mAChRs was observed prior to carbachol addition in both MEF phenotypes. Upon addition of agonist, M2 mAChRs in MEF wild type cells redistributed into discrete intracellular vesicles dispersed throughout the cell while M2 mAChRs expressed in MEF KO1/2 cells remained at the cell surface (Fig. 2B). The diffuse pattern shown in MEF KO1/2 cells represents surface plasma membrane localization since the absence of detergent leads to an identical staining pattern as seen in untreated cells (data not shown). The FLAG-tag is located at the N-terminus of the receptor and is accessible to exogenously added antibody even in the absence of detergent.

Figure 2
figure 2_7

Agonist-promoted internalization of M 2 mAChR in MEFs is β-arrestin-dependent. A.) Approximately 24 h following transfection with M2 mAChR, cells were stimulated with 1 mM carbachol for 1 h and agonist-promoted internalization was determined using [3H-NMS]. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error from 3 separate experiments with each experiment consisting of 8 to 11 independent determinations. Statistical test was performed using ANOVA with the post hoc Bonferroni/Dunn test (asterisk indicates * p < 0.001). B.) Cells were transfected as described above and then incubated in the presence or absence of 1 mM carbachol for 30 minutes prior to indirect immunofluorescence as described in Methods. Images were acquired at 40X.

Full size image

To determine whether selectivity existed between β-arrestin isoforms in their ability to mediate agonist-promoted internalization of M2 mAChRs, we examined agonist promoted internalization in MEF KO1/2 cells co-expressing M2 mAChR and FLAG-tagged β-arrestin 1 and/or 2 (Fig. 3A). Western blotting analysis confirmed that FLAG-tagged β-arrestins were expressed (Fig. 3B). Cells were treated with 1 mM carbachol for 1 h and the extent of receptor internalization was assessed using [3H]-NMS. MEF KO1/2 cells reintroduced with β-arrestin 1, β-arrestin 2, or both isoforms exhibited M2 mAChR uptake similarly (Fig. 3A). These data suggest that not only is agonist-promoted internalization of M2 mAChR β-arrestin-dependent but also there is no selectivity between β-arrestin isoforms (Fig. 2A and 3A). To assess whether stimulated and internalized M2 mAChRs co-localize with β-arrestin 1 or 2, we reintroduced GFP-tagged β-arrestin 1, 2, or both isoforms with FLAG-tagged M2 mAChRs into MEF KO1/2 cells and assessed their localization by immunofluorescence microscopy. Internalized M2 mAChRs remained associated with β-arrestin 1-GFP (data not shown) or β-arrestin 2-GFP (Fig. 4) in intracellular compartments following 30 minutes stimulation with 1 mM carbachol. To determine if this phenomenon occurs in other cell types we expressed M2 mAChRs in HeLa, COS-7, and rat aortic smooth muscle cells (RASMCs). As observed in MEF KO1/2 cells, internalized M2 mAChRs remained co-localized with β-arrestin 2-GFP in HeLa, COS-7, and RASMCs (Fig. 5). These results demonstrate that agonist-promoted internalization of the M2 mAChR is β-arrestin-dependent, and that internalized M2 mAChRs stably associate with either β-arrestin isoform in multiple cell lines.

Figure 3
figure 3_7

Expression of β-arrestin 1 or 2 rescued agonist-promoted internalization of M 2 mAChRs in MEF KO1/2 cells. Approximately 24 h following co-transfection with constructs encoding M2 mAChRs and β-arrestins, cells were stimulated with 1 mM carbachol for 1 h. A.) Agonist-promoted internalization was determined as described in Methods. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of 5 independent experiments consisting of 8–11 determinants. B.) A representative immunoblot of FLAG-tagged β-arrestin and internal protein control β-actin is shown. Lanes consisted of: non-transfected MEF KO1/2 (1), MEF KO1/2 expressing β-arrestin1 (2), MEF KO1/2 expressing β-arrestin 2 (3), and MEF KO1/2 expressing β-arrestin 1 and 2 (4). Western blot shown is a representative of at least 3 independent experiments.

Full size image
Figure 4
figure 4_7

Stimulation of M 2 mAChRs leads to stable co-localization of β-arrestin 2-GFP at intracellular sites. MEF wild type or KO1/2 cells were transiently co-transfected with the human FLAG-tagged M2 mAChR and β-arrestin 2-GFP constructs. Following 30 minutes of 1 mM carbachol stimulation, cells were fixed and processed for indirect immunofluorescence as described in the Methods. Localization of β-arrestin 2-GFP and M2 mAChR was visualized by confocal microscopy. Confocal images are representative of three independent experiments.

Full size image
Figure 5
figure 5_7

Agonist-promoted internalized FLAG-tagged M 2 mAChRs exhibit overlap with β-arrestin 2-GFP at intracellular sites in various cell lines. Cells were transiently transfected with FLAG-tagged M2 mAChR and β-arrestin 2-GFP and treated with 1 mM carbachol for 30 min at 37°C. Co-localization of β-arrestin 2-GFP with internalized M2 mAChRs occurred in HeLa, COS-7 and rat aortic smooth muscle cells (RASMCs). Arrows indicate overlap between β-arrestin 2-GFP and M2 mAChRs in intracellular compartments. Confocal images are representative of three independent experiments.

Full size image

Previously, sequestration of M1, M3, and M4 mAChRs was shown to be both β-arrestin and clathrin-dependent [23, 27]. In contrast M2 mAChR sequestration was reported to be largely β-arrestin and clathrin-independent [22, 28]. To address whether the β-arrestin-dependent internalization we observed in MEFs was independent of clathrin, we expressed in MEF KO1/2 cells arrestin mutants that were selectively defective in interaction with clathrin (β-arrestin 2 ΔLIELD), AP-2 (β-arrestin 2-F391A), or both clathrin/AP-2 (β-arrestin 2 ΔLIELD/F391A) [29]. Expression of either the β-arrestin 2 ΔLIELD or β-arrestin 2-F391A mutant rescued agonist-promoted M2 mAChR internalization (Fig. 6A). However, internalization was only moderately rescued by transient expression of a β-arrestin 2 mutant defective in both clathrin and AP-2 interaction (Fig. 6A). These results indicate that β-arrestin-dependent internalization of M2 mAChR may include a component that is independent of interactions between clathrin and AP-2.

Figure 6
figure 6_7

Expression of β-arrestin mutants deficient in clathrin and/or AP-2 binding interaction partially supports agonist-promoted internalization of M 2 mAChRs in MEF K/O1/2, while expression of truncated carboxyl-terminal region of β-arrestin 1 (319–418) completely blocked agonist promoted M 2 mAChR internalization in MEFwt cells. A.) Approximately 24 hr following co-transfection with FLAG-M2 mAChR and β-arrestin 2 clathrin (ΔLIELD), AP-2 (F391A), or clathrin and AP-2 (ΔLIELD/F391A) mutants, MEF KO1/2 cells were stimulated with 1 mM carbachol for 1 h and agonist-promoted internalization was determined as described in Methods. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation from 4 independent experiments consisting of 8–11 determinants. B.) Approximately 24 hr following transfection with the β-arrestin 1 C-terminal domain (319–418), MEF wild type cells were stimulated with 1 mM carbachol for 1 h and agonist-promoted internalization of receptor was determined as described in Methods. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error from 3 separate experiments with each experiment consisting of 8 to 11 independent determinations. Statistical test was performed using ANOVA with the post hoc Bonferroni/Dunn test (asterisk indicates * p < 0.001).

Full size image

Recent studies by Santini and co-workers [30] showed that agonist-mediated activation of the β2AR was still capable of inducing recruitment into clathrin coated pits in cells expressing mutant arrestin proteins that were defective in binding with clathrin or AP-2, albeit to a reduced degree. Expression of the truncated COOH-terminal region of β-arrestin 1 (319–418), which contains a clathrin binding site but lacks receptor binding, completely inhibited the β2AR mediated clustering of clathrin coated pits [31]. Therefore, we conducted experiments with the truncated β-arrestin 1 (319–418) to determine whether agonist-promoted internalization of the M2 mAChR in MEFs would be affected. Transient expression of the truncated β-arrestin 1 (319–418) completely inhibited the agonist-promoted internalization of the M2 mAChR in MEF wild type cells (Fig. 6B). Thus, it could be argued that the agonist-promoted internalization of M2 mAChR involved a clathrin-dependent pathway. However, as shown previously, expression of an arrestin 2 mutant that was defective in interaction with both clathrin and AP-2 only moderately antagonized the agonist-promoted internalization of M2 mAChR in MEF KO1/2 cells (Fig. 6A). It could be argued that this arrestin mutant, defective in clathrin/AP-2 binding, was still capable of interacting with clathrin/AP-2, albeit to a significantly reduced degree. Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that the agonist-promoted internalization of M2 mAChRs was clathrin-dependent.

Based upon the findings described above, we sought the identity of the endosomal structures to which β-arrestin localized following M2 mAChR activation. We performed co-localization analyses using markers of the early endosome, the early endosomal autoantigen-1 (EEA-1) and the transferrin receptor (TfnR), in combination with β-arrestin 1-GFP. β-arrestin 1-GFP and FLAG-M2 mAChRs were co-expressed in HeLa cells, and cells were stimulated with 1 mM carbachol for 30 minutes. Our results showed that β-arrestin 1-GFP significantly co-localized with EEA-1 and TfnR (as indicated by arrows in Fig. 7). β-arrestin 1-GFP was not observed to be associated with EEA-1 or TfnR in unstimulated HeLa cells (Fig. 7). These results indicate that once M2 mAChRs are internalized via a β-arrestin dependent pathway, they remain co-localized with β-arrestin in clathrin-derived early endosomes. To address whether other muscarinic receptor subtypes stably associate with β-arrestin in endosomes, we co-expressed HA-tagged M1, M3, M4, and M5 mAChRs with β-arrestin 2-GFP in MEF wild type cells and assessed β-arrestin localization using confocal microscopy (Fig. 8). The upper right inset in each frame of the figure shows the localization of the muscarinic receptor subtype for a small section of the cell co-expressing β-arrestin 2-GFP. Overlay images indicate co-immunostaining of mAChRs (red) with β-arrestin 2-GFP (green) and their extent of co-localization (yellow). In the absence of carbachol, β-arrestin 2-GFP was diffusely localized in the cytosol of cells expressing M1 – M5 mAChR subtypes (Fig. 8, 0 min). Following 30 minute carbachol stimulation only cells expressing human FLAG-tagged M2 mAChRs exhibited β-arrestin 2-GFP localization in intracellular compartments as shown by arrows indicating overlap and corresponding overlay image (Fig. 8, 30 min); in cells expressing other receptor subtypes, β-arrestin 2-GFP remained diffusely distributed. Hence, only cells expressing the FLAG-tagged M2 mAChR subtype exhibited a stable interaction with β-arrestin at intracellular sites compared to the other muscarinic subtypes.

Figure 7
figure 7_7

Addition of agonist leads to the redistribution of β-arrestin 1-GFP to early endosomal structures in the cytosol. HeLa cells were transiently transfected with human FLAG-tagged M2 mAChR and β-arrestin 1-GFP and treated with 1 mM carbachol for 30 minutes. Cells were processed for confocal microscopy. β-arrestin 1-GFP complexes localized to the early endosome as shown by colocalization with markers of that compartment (EEA-1 and TfnR). Arrows indicate signficant overlap between TfnR or EEA-1 with β-arrestin 1-GFP. Confocal images are representative of three independent experiments.

Full size image

Discussion

In the present study, we investigated the role of β-arrestin in agonist-promoted internalization of the M2 mAChR, which has previously been reported to be β-arrestin independent. In previous studies, heterologous over-expression of wild type and dominant-negative forms of arrestins was used to assess the function of these proteins [22, 32]. Unfortunately, such studies are difficult to interpret because of the complications associated with endogenous proteins. In an attempt to alleviate these complications, we utilized mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) derived from β-arrestin knockouts in which endogenously expressed β-arrestin 1 and 2 have been genetically eliminated [26]. These cells provide us a unique opportunity to assess whether β-arrestin proteins are involved in the process of agonist-promoted internalization of M2 mAChRs. Herein, we show that agonist-promoted endocytosis of the M2 mAChR is β-arrestin- and clathrin-dependent.

Both β-arrestin 1 and 2 isoforms were reported to form high affinity complexes with the agonist-activated M2 mAChR [33], suggesting that either isoform is capable of mediating agonist-promoted internalization of the receptor. In corroboration with these findings, we observed no selectivity between β-arrestin isoforms in mediating agonist-promoted internalization of M2 mAChRs. Perhaps, this lack of selectivity between β-arrestin 1 and 2 may explain why using over-expression of a single mutant form of β-arrestin fails to completely block the agonist-promoted internalization of M2 mAChRs. Interestingly, our studies further revealed that β-arrestin remained stably associated with the M2 mAChR in juxtanuclear endosomes for prolonged periods of time following agonist exposure. Given that MEF cells do not endogenously express mAChRs, we compared our observations in a physiologically relevant cell line (RASMCs) and two model cell lines (HeLa and COS-7). Similar findings were also observed in these cells. Closer examination of β-arrestin post-endocytic trafficking revealed that M2 mAChR stimulation led to arrestin redistribution into Tfn and EEA-1 positive compartments, markers of the early endosome. In accordance with our findings, Delaney et al. have reported that stimulated M2 mAChRs internalize in a manner that quickly merges with clathrin-derived early endosomes [25].

M2 mAChRs follow the general pattern utilized by most GPCRs in that they are internalized via a β-arrestin-dependent mechanism. Additionally, the stable binding of β-arrestin with activated M2 mAChRs within microcompartments follows the paradigm of other Class B GPCRs. Implications of these findings are that β-arrestin may dictate the intracellular trafficking and/or signalling of the M2 mAchRs. Since β-arrestin has emerged as a versatile adaptor and scaffolding protein, its role in regulating M2 mAChR-dependent cellular activity may be significant. It has been shown that β-arrestins interact with trafficking machinery such as Arf6, RhoA, NSF, and a variety of signalling proteins such as ASK1, JNK3, and ERK1/2 [34]. Stable β-arrestin/receptor complexes, as exhibited by Class B receptors, appear to redirect signalling complexes to the cytoplasm thereby activating cytoplasmic targets while preventing ERK translocation to the nucleus [15, 16, 35]. The physiological role of this process may be to participate in actin cytoskeleton reorganization and chemotaxis [18, 36]. With regard to intracellular trafficking, patterns of β-arrestin binding to activate receptors appear to modulate receptor recycling and/or degradation [37]. Class A receptors are typically resensitized and subsequently recycled while Class B receptors undergo slow recycling and/or down-regulation. M2 mAChRs have been shown to undergo slow recycling back to the plasma membrane upon agonist removal [38]. What role or roles β-arrestin plays in M2 mAChR recycling and/or degradation is currently unknown. The functional consequence of stable β-arrestin/M2 mAChR complexes remains to be determined.

Previous studies have suggested that M2 mAChR internalization does not proceed through a β-arrestin/clathrin mediated pathway [22, 23, 28]. For example, Delaney and co-workers [25] previously reported that M2 mAChRs internalized by a clathrin-independent pathway based upon the use of a dominant-negative K44A dynamin-1 mutant. However, expression of a N-terminal deletion dynamin-1 mutant N272 that lacks the complete GTP-binding domain, unlike K44A dynamin, strongly inhibited agonist-promoted M2 mAChR internalization [39]. Therefore, we conducted experiments with arrestin mutants that were selectively deficient in interaction with clathrin, AP-2, or both clathrin and AP-2, to determine whether agonist mediated internalization of M2 mAChRs was clathrin-dependent. Expression of arrestin mutants defective in interaction with either clathrin (β-arrestin 2-ΔLIELD) or AP-2 (β-arrestin 2-F391A) failed to antagonize M2 mAChR internalization. Moreover, over-expression of a dominant-negative arrestin mutant that was defective in interaction with both clathrin and AP-2 only modestly antagonized M2 mAChR internalization in MEF KO1/2 cells. Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that these data corroborate previous studies indicating that M2 mAChR internalization is clathrin-independent. However, Santini and co-workers [30] have reported that arrestin mutants with impaired binding to clathrin or AP-2 were still capable of displaying recruitment of β2AR to clathrin-coated pits, albeit to a reduced degree. Therefore, it may be premature to conclude that M2 mAChR internalization is β-arrestin-dependent but clathrin/AP-2-independent. Expression of the truncated carboxy-terminal region of β-arrestin 1, which contained the clathrin interaction site, has been shown to completely abrogate β2AR mediated clustering of clathrin coated pits [31]. Exogenous expression of this mutant completely block agonist-promoted internalization of M2 mAChRs in wild type MEFs. Collectively, these results indicate that agonist-promoted internalization of M2 mAChRs is β-arrestin-dependent and most likely clathrin/AP-2-dependent. However, we cannot rule out that the C-terminal region of arrestin 1 is interacting with another factor, independent from clathrin/AP-2 that may be responsible for mediating internalization of the M2 mAChR. Indeed previous studies have shown that the Arf6 GTPase regulates agonist-promoted endocytosis of the M2 mAChR [24, 25]. It has been shown that β2AR stimulation leads to activation of Arf6 GTPase, which facilitates receptor endocytosis [40]. It is feasible that sequestration of M2 mAChR requires activation of Arf6 GTPase by a β-arrestin-mediated pathway, which may be an important component of agonist-promoted internalization of the M2 mAChR. This would corroborate previous studies, which indicate a critical role for Arf6 GTPase in mediating agonist-promoted M2 mAChR internalization [24].

The differential trafficking of β-arrestin with mAChRs to endosomes appears to be subtype specific. There are five muscarinic subtypes termed M1mAChR- M5 mAChR. M1, M3, and M5 mAChRs couple to Gq proteins and activate phospholipase C whereas M2 mAChR and M4 mAChR couple to Gi/o to inhibit adenylyl cyclase and activate K+ channels [1, 2]. As shown in Figure 8, stimulated muscarinic subtypes aside from M2 mAChRs are sequestered into endocytic vesicles that are devoid of β-arrestin. It has been shown that M1 mAChR, M3 mAChR, and M4 mAChR require β-arrestin in mediating agonist-promoted internalization [23] so we do not rule out the possibility that arrestin is recruited to the plasma membrane following stimulation and then rapidly disassociates from the receptor. It is possible that carbachol may induce receptor conformations that may not promote stable β-arrestin associations with the other mAChR subtypes. However, sequence alignment of the M2 and M4 mAChR (using the T-coffee program) revealed that the subtypes exhibit high sequence similarities; interestingly, the sequence differences lie in the third intracellular loop, specifically at residues 293–313 within the M2 mAChR. As described by Pals-Rylaarsdam and others, a cluster of serine and threonine sites at positions 307–311 undergo agonist promoted phosphorylation, which is necessary and sufficient for β-arrestin interaction [6]. This site may be important for designating stable interactions with β-arrestin. M2 mAChR sequences downstream from this site at 348–368 also differ significantly from the M4 mAChR suggesting that an additional motif may be involved.

Figure 8
figure 8_7

Internalized M 2 mAChRs exhibit a differential affinity for β-arrestin 2-GFP compared to other muscarinic subtypes. HeLa cells were transiently co-transfected with plasmids encoding β-arrestin 2-GFP and either HA-tagged M1, M3, M4, M5 mAChR or FLAG-tagged M2 mAChR. Cells were untreated or treated with 1 mM carbachol for 0 min or 30 min. Grayscale image indicates β-arrestin 2-GFP localization while the upper right inset indicates immunostaining of the mAChR in a small section of the cell (outline). Arrows indicate overlap between internalized M2 mAChRs and β-arrestin 2-GFP. Overlay represents co-immunostaining of mAChR (red) and β-arrestin 2-GFP expression (green) and their colocalization (yellow).

Full size image

Conclusion

In summary, the data presented in this study demonstrate that the agonist-promoted endocytosis of the M2 mAChR subtype occurs via an arrestin dependent pathway in MEF cells. Exogenously expressed β-arrestin proteins remained stably associated with the M2 mAChR upon entry into early endosomal compartments. The lack of stable β-arrestin interaction with other mAChR subtypes suggests a unique role of β-arrestin in regulating activity of the M2 mAChR subtype.

Methods

Materials

[3H]-N-methylscopolamine (NMS) (81–84 Ci/mmol) was purchased from Amersham Corp. (Buckinghamshire, England). Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM), F-10, penicillin/streptomycin, fetal bovine serum, restriction enzymes and LipofectAMINE 2000 were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA) EX-GEN was purchased from Fermentas (Hanover, MD). The anti-FLAG M2 monoclonal antibody and mouse anti-M1 FLAG antibody were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO); mouse antibodies against β-arrestin 1 and 2 were purchased from Santa Cruz (Santa Cruz, CA). The anti-HA.11 monoclonal antibody was purchased from Covance Research Product (Berkley, California) Secondary HRP-conjugated antibodies were purchased from Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories Inc. (West Grove, PA). Carbachol, atropine and all other reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Dr. Neil Nathanson (University of Washington) kindly provided the construct expressing the porcine FLAG-tagged M2 mAChR [32]. HA-tagged M1, M3, M4, and M5 mAChRs were purchased from UMR cDNA Resource Center (University of Missouri). Arrestin mutants, β-arrestin 2-ΔLIELD, β-arrestin 2-F391A, β-arrestin 2 ΔLIELD/F391A, and truncated carboxyl-terminal region of β-arrestin 1 (319–418) were kindly provided by Dr. Jeffrey Benovic (Thomas Jefferson University) [30, 31]. The MEF wild type, β-arrestin 1 and 2 single knockouts, β-arrestin 1 and 2 double knockout cells, and constructs for FLAG-tagged β-arrestin 1 and 2 were kindly provided by Dr. Robert Lefkowitz (Duke University Medical Center) [26]. Constructs encoding β-arrestin 2-GFP and β-arrestin 1-GFP were generous gifts from Dr. Stefano Marullo and have been previously described [41].

Cell Culture and Transient Transfection

HeLa, MEF wild-type, MEF single and double β-arrestin knockout, RASMCs, and COS-7 cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 I.U./ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin at 37°C with 5% CO2. For immunocytochemistry, HeLa cells were grown on glass coverslips at a density of 120,000 cells/well in six-well dishes and transfected with EX-GEN or LipofectAMINE 2000 according to the manufacturer's protocol using 1 μg of DNA/well. For ligand binding assays, MEF cells were plated at 80,000 cells/well in 24 well plates and transfected with EX-GEN or LipofectAMINE 2000 according to the manufacturer's protocol using 1 μg of DNA/well.

Radioligand Binding Assay

Receptor internalization was determined by measuring the binding of the membrane impermeable muscarinic antagonist [3H]-N-methylscopolamine ([3H]-NMS) to intact cells as previously described [42]. Briefly, 24–42 h after transfection, MEF cells cultured in 24-well plates were treated or not treated with 1 mM carbachol for 60 min at 37°C. Cultures were washed twice with 1 ml of ice-cold PBS, and labelled with 720 fmol of [3H]-NMS in 1 ml PBS for 4 h at 4°C. Non-specific binding was determined as the bound radioactivity in the presence of 1 μM atropine. Labelled cells were washed two times with 1 ml of ice-cold PBS, solubilized in 0.5 ml of 1% Triton X-100 and combined with 3.5 ml of scintillation fluid followed by measurement of radioactivity. Receptor internalization is defined as percent of surface M2 mAChRs not accessible to [3H]-NMS at each time relative to non-carbachol-treated cells.

Immunoblotting

Western blot analysis was performed on cells cultured in 6-well plates. The cells were solubilized in 0.5 ml of lysis buffer containing: 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 0.5% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, 250 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM sodium fluoride and 1 μg/ml of protease inhibitors leupeptin, aprotinin, pepstatin A, and 100 μM benzamidine. The protein concentration was determined using the Bradford assay method. Fifty μg of cell lysates were subjected to 4–20% SDS-PAGE. After transfer, the nitrocellulose membrane was blocked and then probed with anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody. Immunoreactive bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence after adding HRP-conjugated anti-mouse antibody. After stripping with 0.1 M glycine (pH 2.5), the membrane was re-probed with anti-β-actin using a detection kit from Oncogene (Cambridge, MA).

Indirect Immunofluorescence

24 h following transfection, cells were treated as described in the figure legends, fixed in 4% formaldehyde in PBS for 5 minutes, and rinsed with 10% fetal bovine serum and 0.02% azide in PBS (PBS/serum). Fixed cells were incubated with primary antibodies diluted in PBS/serum containing 0.2% saponin for 45 minutes, and then washed with PBS/serum (3 × 5 min.). The cells were then incubated with fluorescently labelled secondary antibodies in PBS-serum and 0.2% saponin for 45 minutes, washed with PBS/serum (3 × 5 min.) and once with PBS, and mounted on glass slides. Images were acquired using a Zeiss LSM 510 scanning confocal microscope or an Olympus BX40 epifluorescence microscope equipped with a 60× Plan pro lens, and photomicrographs were prepared using an Olympus MagnaFire SP digital camera (Olympus America, Inc.). All images were processed with Adobe Photoshop 7.0 software.

RNA Isolation and RT-PCR

Total cellular RNA from MEF cells, cortex and cerebellum of 2–3 week old Sprague Dawley rat pups was isolated using TriZol according to the manufacturer's instructions. A 50 μl reaction solution containing 1 μg total RNA was reverse-transcribed, and PCR was performed using gene-specific primers and the Qiagen One-step RT-PCR kit. Gene specific primers and amplification reactions were as follows: Rat M1 mAChR (175 bp amplified product): CCTCTGCTGCCGCTGTTG (sense) and GGTGGGTGCCTGTGCTTCA (antisense); Rat M2 mAChR (686 bp amplified product): CACGAAACCTC TGA CCTACCC (sense) and TCTGACCCGACGACCCAACTA (antisense); Rat M4 mAChR (587 bp amplified product): TGGGTCTTGTCCTTTGT GCTC (sense) and TTCATTGCCTGTCTGCTT TGTTA (antisense); Rat β-actin (764 bp amplified product): TTGTAACCAACTGGGACGATATGG (sense) and GATCTT GATCT TCATGGT GCTAGG (antisense). Cycling parameters were 30 minutes at 50°C for reverse transcription followed by 1 minute 95°C hot start followed by 28 cycles at 95°C for 1 minute, 62°C for 1 minute, and 72°C for 45 seconds and a final cycle at 72°C for 7 minutes.

References

  1. Nathanson NM: Molecular properties of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Annu Rev Neurosci 1987, 10:195–236.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wess J: Molecular biology of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Crit Rev Neurobiol 1996,10(1):69–99.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Caulfield MP: Muscarinic receptors--characterization, coupling and function. Pharmacol Ther 1993,58(3):319–379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Burgoyne RD: Regulation of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor: effects of phosphorylating conditions on agonist and antagonist binding. J Neurochem 1983,40(2):324–331.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moro O, Lameh J, Sadee W: Serine- and threonine-rich domain regulates internalization of muscarinic cholinergic receptors. J Biol Chem 1993,268(10):6862–6865.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pals-Rylaarsdam R, Hosey MM: Two homologous phosphorylation domains differentially contribute to desensitization and internalization of the m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. J Biol Chem 1997,272(22):14152–14158.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pals-Rylaarsdam R, Xu Y, Witt-Enderby P, Benovic JL, Hosey MM: Desensitization and internalization of the m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor are directed by independent mechanisms. J Biol Chem 1995,270(48):29004–29011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Waugh MG, Challiss RA, Berstein G, Nahorski SR, Tobin AB: Agonist-induced desensitization and phosphorylation of m1-muscarinic receptors. Biochem J 1999, 338 ( Pt 1):175–183.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Haga K, Kameyama K, Haga T: Synergistic activation of a G protein-coupled receptor kinase by G protein beta gamma subunits and mastoparan or related peptides. J Biol Chem 1994,269(17):12594–12599.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferguson SS, Downey WE 3rd, Colapietro AM, Barak LS, Menard L, Caron MG: Role of beta-arrestin in mediating agonist-promoted G protein-coupled receptor internalization. Science 1996,271(5247):363–366.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Laporte SA, Oakley RH, Zhang J, Holt JA, Ferguson SS, Caron MG, Barak LS: The beta2-adrenergic receptor/betaarrestin complex recruits the clathrin adaptor AP-2 during endocytosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999,96(7):3712–3717.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shenoy SK, Lefkowitz RJ: Multifaceted roles of beta-arrestins in the regulation of seven-membrane-spanning receptor trafficking and signalling. Biochem J 2003,375(Pt 3):503–515.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goodman OB Jr., Krupnick JG, Santini F, Gurevich VV, Penn RB, Gagnon AW, Keen JH, Benovic JL: Beta-arrestin acts as a clathrin adaptor in endocytosis of the beta2-adrenergic receptor. Nature 1996,383 (6599) :447–450.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McDonald PH, Chow CW, Miller WE, Laporte SA, Field ME, Lin FT, Davis RJ, Lefkowitz RJ: Beta-arrestin 2: a receptor-regulated MAPK scaffold for the activation of JNK3. Science 2000,290(5496):1574–1577.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tohgo A, Choy EW, Gesty-Palmer D, Pierce KL, Laporte S, Oakley RH, Caron MG, Lefkowitz RJ, Luttrell LM: The stability of the G protein-coupled receptor-beta-arrestin interaction determines the mechanism and functional consequence of ERK activation. J Biol Chem 2003,278(8):6258–6267.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tohgo A, Pierce KL, Choy EW, Lefkowitz RJ, Luttrell LM: beta-Arrestin scaffolding of the ERK cascade enhances cytosolic ERK activity but inhibits ERK-mediated transcription following angiotensin AT1a receptor stimulation. J Biol Chem 2002,277(11):9429–9436.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Luttrell LM, Ferguson SS, Daaka Y, Miller WE, Maudsley S, Della Rocca GJ, Lin F, Kawakatsu H, Owada K, Luttrell DK, Caron MG, Lefkowitz RJ: Beta-arrestin-dependent formation of beta2 adrenergic receptor-Src protein kinase complexes. Science 1999,283(5402):655–661.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hunton DL, Barnes WG, Kim J, Ren XR, Violin JD, Reiter E, Milligan G, Patel DD, Lefkowitz RJ: Beta-arrestin 2-dependent angiotensin II type 1A receptor-mediated pathway of chemotaxis. Mol Pharmacol 2005,67(4):1229–1236.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Oakley RH, Laporte SA, Holt JA, Caron MG, Barak LS: Differential affinities of visual arrestin, beta arrestin1, and beta arrestin2 for G protein-coupled receptors delineate two major classes of receptors. J Biol Chem 2000,275(22):17201–17210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Oakley RH, Laporte SA, Holt JA, Barak LS, Caron MG: Association of beta-arrestin with G protein-coupled receptors during clathrin-mediated endocytosis dictates the profile of receptor resensitization. J Biol Chem 1999,274(45):32248–32257.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Anborgh PH, Seachrist JL, Dale LB, Ferguson SS: Receptor/beta-arrestin complex formation and the differential trafficking and resensitization of beta2-adrenergic and angiotensin II type 1A receptors. Mol Endocrinol 2000,14(12):2040–2053.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vogler O, Nolte B, Voss M, Schmidt M, Jakobs KH, van Koppen CJ: Regulation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor sequestration and function by beta-arrestin. J Biol Chem 1999,274(18):12333–12338.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Claing A, Perry SJ, Achiriloaie M, Walker JK, Albanesi JP, Lefkowitz RJ, Premont RT: Multiple endocytic pathways of G protein-coupled receptors delineated by GIT1 sensitivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000,97(3):1119–1124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Houndolo T, Boulay PL, Claing A: G protein-coupled receptor endocytosis in ADP-ribosylation factor 6-depleted cells. J Biol Chem 2005,280(7):5598–5604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Delaney KA, Murph MM, Brown LM, Radhakrishna H: Transfer of M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors to clathrin-derived early endosomes following clathrin-independent endocytosis. J Biol Chem 2002,277(36):33439–33446.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kohout TA, Lin FS, Perry SJ, Conner DA, Lefkowitz RJ: beta-Arrestin 1 and 2 differentially regulate heptahelical receptor signaling and trafficking. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001,98(4):1601–1606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tolbert LM, Lameh J: Human muscarinic cholinergic receptor Hm1 internalizes via clathrin-coated vesicles. J Biol Chem 1996,271(29):17335–17342.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pals-Rylaarsdam R, Gurevich VV, Lee KB, Ptasienski JA, Benovic JL, Hosey MM: Internalization of the m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Arrestin-independent and -dependent pathways. J Biol Chem 1997,272(38):23682–23689.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim YM, Benovic JL: Differential roles of arrestin-2 interaction with clathrin and adaptor protein 2 in G protein-coupled receptor trafficking. J Biol Chem 2002,277(34):30760–30768.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Santini F, Gaidarov I, Keen JH: G protein-coupled receptor/arrestin3 modulation of the endocytic machinery. J Cell Biol 2002,156(4):665–676.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Krupnick JG, Santini F, Gagnon AW, Keen JH, Benovic JL: Modulation of the arrestin-clathrin interaction in cells. Characterization of beta-arrestin dominant-negative mutants. J Biol Chem 1997,272(51):32507–32512.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schlador ML, Nathanson NM: Synergistic regulation of m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor desensitization and sequestration by G protein-coupled receptor kinase-2 and beta-arrestin-1. J Biol Chem 1997,272(30):18882–18890.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gurevich VV, Dion SB, Onorato JJ, Ptasienski J, Kim CM, Sterne-Marr R, Hosey MM, Benovic JL: Arrestin interactions with G protein-coupled receptors. Direct binding studies of wild type and mutant arrestins with rhodopsin, beta 2-adrenergic, and m2 muscarinic cholinergic receptors. J Biol Chem 1995,270(2):720–731.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lefkowitz RJ, Shenoy SK: Transduction of receptor signals by beta-arrestins. Science 2005,308(5721):512–517.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. DeFea KA, Zalevsky J, Thoma MS, Dery O, Mullins RD, Bunnett NW: beta-arrestin-dependent endocytosis of proteinase-activated receptor 2 is required for intracellular targeting of activated ERK1/2. J Cell Biol 2000,148(6):1267–1281.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Scott MG, Pierotti V, Storez H, Lindberg E, Thuret A, Muntaner O, Labbe-Jullie C, Pitcher JA, Marullo S: Cooperative regulation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation and cell shape change by filamin A and beta-arrestins. Mol Cell Biol 2006,26(9):3432–3445.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Shenoy SK, Lefkowitz RJ: Trafficking patterns of beta-arrestin and G protein-coupled receptors determined by the kinetics of beta-arrestin deubiquitination. J Biol Chem 2003,278(16):14498–14506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Roseberry AG, Hosey MM: Trafficking of M(2) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. J Biol Chem 1999,274(47):33671–33676.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Werbonat Y, Kleutges N, Jakobs KH, van Koppen CJ: Essential role of dynamin in internalization of M2 muscarinic acetylcholine and angiotensin AT1A receptors. J Biol Chem 2000,275(29):21969–21974.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Claing A, Chen W, Miller WE, Vitale N, Moss J, Premont RT, Lefkowitz RJ: beta-Arrestin-mediated ADP-ribosylation factor 6 activation and beta 2-adrenergic receptor endocytosis. J Biol Chem 2001,276(45):42509–42513.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Scott MG, Benmerah A, Muntaner O, Marullo S: Recruitment of activated G protein-coupled receptors to pre-existing clathrin-coated pits in living cells. J Biol Chem 2002,277(5):3552–3559.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Halvorsen SW, Nathanson NM: In vivo regulation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor number and function in embryonic chick heart. J Biol Chem 1981,256(15):7941–7948.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Nael McCarty and Dr. Harish Radhakrishna, Georgia Institute of Technology, for critical reading of the manuscript. The source of funding for this study was from the National Institutes of Health Grants NINDS NS044164, U54-NS 34194, NCRR P20 RR15583, and NCRR P20 RR17670.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, 30332, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Kymry T Jones

  2. Laboratorio de Parasitologia (301), Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Columbia

    Maria Echeverry

  3. Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Neuroscience Institute, Morehouse School of Medicine, 30310, GA, Atlanta, USA

    Alicia Gates

  4. Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Montana, 59812, Missoula, MT, USA

    Valerie A Mosser & Darrell A Jackson

Authors
  1. Kymry T Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria Echeverry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Valerie A Mosser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alicia Gates
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Darrell A Jackson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kymry T Jones, Maria Echeverry or Darrell A Jackson.

Additional information

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

KTJ and ME carried out the radioligand binding, western blot analysis, immunocytochemistry, and draft of the manuscript. AG carried out the RT-PCR experiments. VM helped to draft the manuscript. DAJ conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, performed the statistical analysis and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, K.T., Echeverry, M., Mosser, V.A. et al. Agonist mediated internalization of M2 mAChR is β-arrestin-dependent. J Mol Signal 1, 7 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-2187-1-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-2187-1-7

Journal of Molecular Signaling

ISSN: 1750-2187