- Research article
- Open Access
Rad6B acts downstream of Wnt signaling to stabilize β-catenin: Implications for a novel Wnt/β-catenin target
© Gerard et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 23 May 2011
- Accepted: 18 July 2011
- Published: 18 July 2011
Aberrant Wnt/β-catenin signaling is associated with breast cancer even though genetic mutations in Wnt signaling components are rare. We have previously demonstrated that Rad6B, an ubiquitin conjugating enzyme, stabilizes β-catenin via polyubiqutin modifications that render β-catenin insensitive to proteasomal degradation. Rad6B is a transcriptional target of β-catenin, creating a positive feedback loop between Rad6B expression and β-catenin activation.
To isolate subpopulations expressing high or low Rad6B levels, we transfected MDA-MB-231 or WS-15 human breast cancer cells with ZsGreen fluorescent reporter vector in which the expression of ZsGreen was placed under the control of Rad6B promoter. ZsGreenhigh and ZsGreenlow subpopulations, reflective of high and low Rad6B promoter activity, respectively, were isolated by FACS. To determine the relevance of Wnt signaling in Rad6B-mediated β-catenin stabilization/activation, the ZsGreenhigh cells were transfected with signaling-defective Wnt coreceptor LRP6Δ173. Rad6B expression and promoter activity were determined by RT-PCR, Western blot and Rad6B promoter-mediated luciferase assays. β-catenin levels and transcriptional activity were determined by Western blot and TOP/FOP Flash reporter assays. Tumor formation and morphologies of ZsGreenlow, ZsGreenhigh, and ZsGreenhigh/LRP6Δ173 cells compared to unsorted vector controls were evaluated in nude mice. Expression of Wnt signaling related genes was profiled using the Wnt signaling pathway RT2 Profiler PCR arrays.
ZsGreenhigh subpopulations showed high Rad6B expression and Rad6B promoter activity as compared to ZsGreenlow cells. ZsGreenhigh (high Rad6B expressors) also showed elevated β-catenin levels and TOP/Flash activity. Inhibiting Wnt signaling in the high Rad6B expressors decreased ZsGreen fluorescence, Rad6B gene expression, β-catenin levels and TOP/Flash activity. Tumors derived from high Rad6B expressors were predominantly composed of cells with epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype as compared to control tumors that were composed of both cuboidal and EMT-type cells. Tumors derived from low Rad6B expressors lacked EMT phenotype. Inhibition of LRP6 function in the high Rad6B expressors abrogated the EMT phenotype. Gene expression profiling showed upregulation of several Wnt signaling pathway regulators in high Rad6B expressors that were downregulated by interference of Wnt signaling with mutant LRP6 or by Rad6B silencing.
These data reveal a functional link between the canonical Wnt pathway and Rad6B in β-catenin activation and breast cancer progression.
The canonical Wnt signaling pathway regulates several processes including early neoplasia. Activation of the canonical Wnt pathway involves stabilization of β-catenin through the binding of Wnt ligands to the cell surface Frizzled (Fz) family receptors and low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR)-related protein 5 (LRP5) and LRP6. The major output of this pathway is nuclear translocation of β-catenin, which stimulates expression of β-catenin responsive target genes that promote cell proliferation, differentiation, and invasion [1–4]. In the absence of Wnt ligands, β-catenin is phosphorylated by a multiprotein degradation complex involving APC, Axin, GSK3β and casein kinase 1, which marks it for ubiquitination and degradation by the 26S proteasome [5, 6]. Although genetic mutations of APC, Axin or β-catenin are involved in the development of several types of cancer, they are rarely observed in breast cancer . However, compelling evidence has indicated that abnormal regulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling can lead to mammary carcinogenesis [8–13]. Upregulated nuclear/cytoplasmic β-catenin is found in 40-60% of human breast cancer specimens and correlates with poor prognosis [14, 15]. This suggests that alternate/additional mechanisms of β-catenin stabilization may be the underlying cause(s) of aberrant β-catenin activation in breast cancer patients. Overexpression of Wnt ligands Wnt 1, Wnt 10 b or an activated form of β-catenin in mice results in mammary tumors [16, 17]. In human breast cancer, secreted Frizzled protein (sFRP-1), a member of the Wnt antagonist family, is downregulated in malignant tissues [18, 19]. Expression of Wnt coreceptors LRP6, but not LRP5, was found to be upregulated in a subset of human breast carcinomas, and downregulation of LRP6 was sufficient to inhibit breast carcinogenesis . We have previously demonstrated that Rad6B, a 17-kDa ubiquitin conjugating enzyme , stabilizes β-catenin by inducing K63-linked β-catenin polyubiquitination, which renders β-catenin insensitive to 26S proteasomal degradation . Rad6B silencing decreases polyubiquitinated β-catenin levels and activity, and suppresses the epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype of WS-15 human breast cancer cells . Rad6B expression is low in normal human breast tissues, but increases in Rad6B expression is observed in early breast cancer with frequent overexpression in breast carcinomas . Rad6B itself is a transcriptional target of ∃-catenin/T-Cell Factor (24), suggesting the presence of a positive feedback loop between Rad6B gene expression and β-catenin stabilization.
Here we determined if Rad6B mediated β-catenin stabilization in breast cancer cells requires intact Wnt signaling. Using the human Rad6B promoter to direct expression of ZsGreen reporter protein, we isolated breast cancer subpopulations expressing high and low levels of Rad6B, and demonstrated β-catenin activation in high Rad6B subpopulations. Further, the Rad6B-mediated β-catenin activation requires intact Wnt signaling since disruption of Wnt signaling in high Rad6B expressors with a signaling defective LRP6, decreases β-catenin levels and activity, and Rad6B promoter-directed reporter and Rad6B gene expression. Breast cancer subpopulations selected for high Rad6B produce tumors with the EMT phenotype, which is suppressed by blocking LRP6 function. These data suggest that Rad6B functions downstream of Wnt signaling in β-catenin stabilization and breast cancer progression.
MDA-MB-231 (American Type Culture Collection), WS-15 (Cell Core Facility of Karmanos Cancer Institute), pLKO-Rad6BshRNA and empty pLKO WS-15 human breast cancer  cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle/F-12 medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum.
The human Rad6B (R6B) promoter sequence (bases -401/+9 relative to the ATG start codon +1; GenBank:NM_003337) was subcloned into the XhoI/HindIII sites of promoterless pZsGreen1 reporter vector. The integrity of the cloned sequence was verified by DNA sequencing. Construction and activity of the human Rad6B promoter subcloned into pGL3-Basic reporter vector has been described previously . LRP6Δ173 lacking the C-terminal 173 amino acids subcloned into pcDNA3.1 and tagged at the C-terminus with myc and polyhistidine tags was a generous gift from Dr. Anthony Brown at Weill Medical College of Cornell University (25). LRP6Δ173 lacks the PPP(S/T)Px(S/T) motifs that are critical for efficient signaling [25, 26].
Transfections and Fluorescence-activated cell sorting
MDA-MB-231 cells were transfected with pR6B promoter-ZsGreen1 or the corresponding promoterless vector with Metafectene (Biontex) and clones selected with G418. Single cell suspensions of pooled clones from R6B promoter-ZsGreen transfections were sorted in BD FACSDiVa, and the top and bottom 10% of cells with the highest (referred as R6B-Zshigh) and lowest (referred as R6B-Zslow) ZsGreen fluorescence, respectively, were collected into 50% FBS in Phosphate buffered saline and propagated. R6B-Zshigh cells were stably transfected with pcDNA-LRP6Δ173 or empty vector, and ZsGreen fluorescence analyzed by flow cytometry.
Immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, and Western blotting
Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence analyses were performed on paraffin-embedded xenografts or cells as previously described . For immunohistochemical analysis, proteins were detected with appropriate biotinylated secondary antibodies and HRP-conjugated streptavidin. Nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin. For immunofluorescence analysis, proteins were detected with FITC- or Texas Red-conjugated secondary antibodies, and counterstained with DAPI. Slides were stained in the absence of primary antibody or with isotype-matched nonimmune IgG to assess nonspecific reactions. Images were collected on Olympus BX60 microscope equipped with Sony high resolution/sensitivity CCD video camera. The antibodies used for immunohistochemistry and/or immunofluorescence were: anti-Rad6 [22, 23], anti-β-catenin (SantaCruz ), anti-myc tag (gift from Dr. Guri Tzivion, University of Mississippi), anti-Vimentin (Abcam), and anti-Snail1 (Abcam). Since our Rad6 antibody does not distinguish the two isoforms Rad6A and Rad6B, we have indicated the detected protein as Rad6. Mass spectrometry analysis of proteins immunoprecipitated from human breast cells using our anti-Rad6 antibody identified only Rad6B peptides, indicating that Rad6B is the major isoform in breast cells (unpublished data). Moreover, the expression levels of Rad6 protein correlate with the molecular data (Rad6B promoter assays and Rad6B RNAi), confirming the identity of Rad6B detected by our antibody. Cytosols were prepared from control, R6B-Zshigh, R6B-Zslow, and R6B-Zshigh/LRP6Δ173 MDA-MB-231 cells, and control, R6B-Zshigh and Rad6BshRNA WS-15  cells as previously described, and analyzed by immunoblotting for Rad6, β-catenin, LRP6, myc-tagged mutant LRP6 or β-actin.
Luciferase assays and gene expression analysis
To assay the transcriptional activity of ∃-catenin, cells were transiently transfected with a mixture (40:1) of inducible (pTOP/Flash) or mutant (pFOP/Flash) TCF-responsive firefly luciferase (Upstate Biotechnology) and pRLTK (Promega) vectors as previously described . The R6B promoter-luciferase reporter vector  was substituted for pTOP/Flash in some assays to assess Rad6B promoter activity. All experiments were performed thrice in duplicate. Firefly and Renilla activities in lysates were assayed with a Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega).
Total RNA was prepared from control, R6B-Zshigh and R6B-Zshigh/LRP6Δ173 MDA-MB-231 cells with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). Total RNA (1.0 μg) was reverse-transcribed using Superscript III (Invitrogen), and Rad6B cDNA was PCR amplified with +17/+33 and +114/+97 [GenBank:NM_003337] forward and reverse primers, respectively . GAPDH expression was monitored by amplifications with forward (+186/+206) and reverse (+320/+302) [GenBank:XM_006959] primers. The reaction conditions that yielded a detectable product with the minimum number of cycles were employed: 95°C, 1 min/55°C, 1 min/65°C, 2 min for 21 cycles.
Real time RT-PCR analysis of Wnt signaling genes
The human Wnt signaling pathway RT2 Profiler PCR arrays (SuperArray Bioscience) were used to profile the expression of 84 genes related to Wnt signaling. Total RNA was extracted from R6B-Zshigh, R6B-Zshigh/LRP6Δ173, Rad6BshRNA MDA-MB-231 or WS-15 cells and their controls with TRIzol. Single stranded cDNA was synthesized from 2 μg of total RNA by using the SuperArray reaction ready first strand cDNA synthesis kit. The cDNAs were mixed with SuperArray RT2 Real time SYBR Green/ROX PCR master mix and real time PCR performed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Thermal cycling and fluorescence detection were performed using an ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems), and expression of Wnt regulated transcripts were compared between the groups.
In vivo assays
Xenografts of MDA-MB-231 or WS-15 derived subpopulations were generated by injecting 1 × 106 or 5 × 106 MDA-MB-231 or WS-15 derivatives, respectively, in 0.1 ml serum-free media or Matrigel subcutaneously near the nipple of gland #5 of female nude mice. Xenografts were removed at 50 days and fixed in buffered-formalin. In vivo experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, and conformed to the NIH regulatory standards.
Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase biotin-dUTP nick end-labeling (TUNEL)
TUNEL staining was performed as previously described . Apoptotic cells in MDA-MB-231 xenografts were identified on deparaffinized sections using the Deadend fluorimetric TUNEL system (Promega). Sections were counterstained with propidium iodide. Images were captured with an Olympus BX40 microscope and processed with the M5+ microcomputer imaging device (Interfocus Imaging, Ltd., Cambridge, U.K.).
Data were analyzed with GraphPad software using either Student's t test or ANOVA. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Tumor subpopulations with endogenous Rad6B overexpression show elevated β-catenin levels and activity
Rad6B overexpressing breast cancer subpopulations produce tumors with homogeneous epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype
General relevance of Rad6B and Wnt/β-catenin link
Control WS-15 cells implanted into the mammary fatpads of female nude mice produce large tumors within 60 days (Figure 5F). These tumors are composed of a small hyperplastic region (Figure 5Ea, short arrow) and a larger malignant area (Figure 5Ea, long arrow). Similar xenograft assays performed with R6B-Zshigh WS-15 cells produced large tumors (Figure 5F) that were generously populated with blood vessels (long arrows in Figure 5Eb and 5b'), and lacked the benign hyperplastic areas observed in control tumors (Figure 5E, compare a and b). Immunohistochemical analysis showed strong Rad6 staining in the cytoplasm of control tumors (Figure 5Ea') whereas Rad6 expression was observed in the cytoplasm and nuclei of R6B-Zshigh WS-15 tumors (short arrow in Figure 5Eb'). Control xenografts showed strong β-catenin staining in the cytoplasm and cell membranes (Figure 5Ea''), whereas R6B-Zshigh tumors showed strong cytoplasmic β-catenin expression with loss of staining on the cell membranes (Figure 5b''). WS-15-Rad6BshRNA cells produced significantly smaller tumors (P < 0.001) as compared to vector control or R6B-Zshigh WS-15 cells (Figure 5F). WS-15-Rad6BshRNA tumors were comprised of hyperplastic ducts and noticeably lacked the malignant region observed in vector control and R6B-Zshigh WS-15 tumors (compare Figure 5Ea and 5Eb with 5Ec). Rad6B silenced WS-15 tumors showed an overall decrease in Rad6 and β-catenin staining as compared to R6B-Zshigh and vector control WS-15 tumors (Figure 5Ec' and 5c'').
Expression of Wnt regulated genes are influenced by Rad6B status
In this study, we provide novel evidence for a functional link between Wnt signaling and Rad6B in β-catenin activation, and the potential value of using Rad6B to target the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in human breast cancer. The data from this paper show that elevated β-catenin levels and activity observed in Rad6B-overexpressing breast cancer subpopulations (R6B-Zshigh) require intact Wnt signaling since disruption of Wnt signaling in R6B-Zshigh cells with a signaling defective LRP6 lacking 173 amino acids in the c-tail  dramatically inhibits β-catenin levels and activity. The c-tail of LRP6 is a substrate for Wnt induced Dvl dependent phosphorylation [30–32]. The phosphorylated c-tail PPPSPXS motifs recruit Axin and GSK3β , and inhibits GSK3β by acting as competitive inhibitor of this kinase [33–36] with resultant accumulation of unphosphorylated β-catenin in the cytoplasm and translocation to the nucleus [4, 37]. Rad6B is a transcriptional target of β-catenin . Consistent with this, our present data show that inhibition of LRP6 signaling in R6B-Zshigh breast cancer cells induces a reduction in Rad6B promoter activity as evidenced by decrease in Rad6B promoter-mediated ZsGreen and luciferase reporter expressions and Rad6B gene expression.
Rad6B is overexpressed in human breast tumors [23, 24]. To determine the functional contribution of Rad6B in breast cancer development and progression, in vivo assays were performed with MDA-MB-231 or WS-15 human breast cancer cells selected for high or low endogenous Rad6B expression. Although the tumors produced by R6B-Zshigh MDA-MB-231 cells are smaller than those from unselected control MDA-MB-231 cells, it is notable that R6B-Zshigh tumors are predominantly composed of spindle shaped cells that are typical of EMT, and capable of metastasizing spontaneously to the lung (1 out of 8) and lymph node (2 out of 8) of nude mice. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition plays a critical role in regulating cell migration during neoplastic invasion . The Snail superfamily of zinc-finger transcription factors is essential for induction of EMT and invasive process . Wnt signaling promotes tumor invasion by stabilizing Snail1 in breast cancer cells . R6B-Zshigh MDA-MB-231 tumors show strong Snail1 expression, which is downregulated by mutant LRP6, whereas R6B-Zslow MDA-MB-231 tumors lack the spindle shaped cells and express low or negligible Snail1. EMT is also frequently associated with loss of E-cadherin . However, E-cadherin expression is very low in MDA-MB-231 cells . Thus, it is likely that the epithelial mesenchymal transitions we have observed are a consequence of the nuclear activity of β-catenin rather than those involving interactions with E-cadherin.
The Wnt/β-catenin is frequently activated in human breast cancer. 40-60% of human breast cancers exhibit nuclear/cytoplasmic β-catenin and aberrant activation of the pathway at the receptor level is common [14, 15, 24, 43–45]. LRP6 expression is upregulated in basal-like breast cancer . Transgenic mice that overexpress LRP6 in mammary epithelial cells develop mammary gland hyperplasia, but fail to develop adenocarcinoma  suggesting the requirement for additional mechanisms for activating the Wnt pathway. Cooperation between Rad6B and intact Wnt signaling in breast cancer is apparent by the development of tumors with homogeneous EMT phenotype from R6B-Zshigh MDA-MB-231 cells as compared to R6B-Zshigh/LRP6Δ173 derived tumors that are growth inhibited and lack the EMT phenotype. These findings are consistent with the data from Liu et al  that inhibition of LRP6 with the antagonist Mesd suppresses tumor growth and Wnt1 induced signaling. Our in vivo assays with WS-15 breast cancer cells further confirm the role of Rad6B in breast cancer progression since R6B-Zshigh WS-15 cells produced very angiogenic carcinomas as compared to controls, whereas Rad6B silencing inhibited progression to carcinoma with resultant benign hyperplastic tumors.
Our data from profiling of Wnt related genes show upregulation of several Wnt signaling pathway regulators in Rad6B overexpressing breast cancer cells, which are downregulated either by mutant LRP6 or Rad6B silencing. Wnt ligands are upregulated in subset of human breast cancers [20, 48]. Since suppression of LRP6 in Rad6B overexpressing breast cancer cells results in decreases in expression of Wnt ligands (Wnt 2B, Wnt 6, Wnt 9A, Wnt 10A), β-catenin transcriptional activity and tumor growth suggests that overexpression of Rad6B and Wnt ligands may act in concert to influence breast cancer progression. Wnt5A expression was not affected by LRP6 suppression or Rad6B gene silencing, suggesting that Wnt 5A is not a critical regulator of the canonical Wnt pathway in MDA-MB-231 or WS-15 cells. The Wnt negative regulator sFRP-1 is reduced or lost in 80% of breast carcinomas [18, 49]. However, our data showed that sFRP-1 is overexpressed in Rad6B overexpressing cells, and downregulated by Rad6B silencing or LRP6 suppression. This is consistent with a negative feedback response that may act to restrict the exposure of cells to a prolonged Wnt growth factor signal. Nevertheless, despite overexpression of sFRPs in R6B-Zshigh cells, the net outcome is one of increased β-catenin activity and tumor progression.
Taken together that similar outcomes on β-catenin activity, EMT suppression, or breast cancer progression are achieved by inhibiting LRP6 or Rad6B , illustrate the cooperation between the canonical Wnt signaling pathway and Rad6B in β-catenin activation. These data suggest that antagonizing Rad6B or LRP6 function may be beneficial for treatment of a subset of triple negative breast cancers or breast cancers with autocrine Wnt activity.
This work was funded by grants from the United States Department of Defense W81XWH07-1-0562 and W81XWH-09-1-0608 (MPS).
We thank Dr. Anthony Brown for providing the myc-tagged LRP6Δ173 construct, and Dr. Guri Tzivion for the anti-myc tag antibody. We also thank Dr. Gloria Heppner for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript.
- Dierick H, Bejsovec A: Cellular mechanisms of wingless/Wnt signal transduction. Curr Top Dev Biol 1999, 43:153–190.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Logan CY, Nusse R: The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease. Ann Rev Cell Dev Biol 2004, 20:781–810.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Seidensticker MJ, Behrens J: Biochemical interactions in the wnt pathway. Biochim Biophys Acta 2000, 1495:168–182.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clevers H: Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and disease. Cell 2006, 127:469–480.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Polakis P: Wnt signaling and cancer. Genes & Dev 2000, 14:1837–1851.Google Scholar
- Kitagawa M, Hatakeyama S, Shirane M: An F-box protein, FWD1, mediates ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis of β-catenin. EMBO J 1999, 18:2401–2410.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Candidus S, Bischoff P, Becker KF, Hofler H: No evidence for mutations in the alpha- and beta-catenin genes in human gastric and breast carcinomas. Cancer Res 1996, 56:49–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li Y, Welm B, Podsypanina K, Huang S, Chamorro M, Zhang X, Rowlands R, Egeblad M, Cowin P, Werb Z, Tan LK, Rosen JM, Varmus HE: Evidence that transgenes encoding components of the Wnt signaling pathway preferentially induce mammary cancers from progenitor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100:15853–15858.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brennan KR, Brown AMC: Wnt proteins in mammary development and cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2004, 9:119–131.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Turashvili G, Bouchal J, Burkadze G, Kolar Z: Wnt signaling pathway in mammary gland development and carcinogenesis. Pathobiology 2006, 73:213–223.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lindvall C, Bu W, Williams BO, Li Y: Wnt signaling, stem cells, and the cellular origin of breast cancer. Stem Cell Review 2007, 3:157–168.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schlosshauer PW, Brown SA, Eisinger K, Yan Q, Guglielminetti ER, Parsons R, Ellenson LH, Kitajewski J: APC truncation and increased beta-catenin levels in a human breast cancer cell line. Carcinogenesis 2000, 21:1453–1456.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Howe LR, Brown AM: Wnt signaling and breast cancer. Cancer Biol Ther 2004, 3:36–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin SY, Xia W, Wang JC, Kwong KY, Spohn B, Wen Y, Pestell RG, Hung MC: Beta-catenin, a novel prognostic marker for breast cancer: its roles in cyclin D1 expression and cancer progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000, 97:4262–4266.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nakopoulou L, Mylona E, Papadaki I, Kavantzas N, Giannopoulou I, Markaki S, Keramopoulos A: Study of phospho-beta-catenin subcellular distribution in invasive breast carcinomas in relation to their phenotype and the clinical outcome. Mod Pathol 2006, 19:556–563.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tsukamoto AS, Grosschedl R, Guzman RC, Parslow T, Varmus HE: Expression of the int-1 gene in transgenic mice is associated with mammary gland hyperplasia and adenocarcinomas in male and female mice. Cell 1988, 55:619–625.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lane TF, Leder P: Wnt-10b directs hypermorphic development and transformation in mammary glands of male and female mice. Oncogene 1997, 15:2133–2144.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ugolini F, Charafe-Jauffret E, Bardou VJ, Geneix J, Adélaïde J, Labat-Moleur F, Penault-Llorca F, Longy M, Jacquemier J, Birnbaum D, Pébusque MJ: WNT pathway and mammary carcinogenesis: loss of expression of candidate tumor suppressor gene SFRP1 in most invasive carcinomas except of the medullary type. Oncogene 2001, 20:5810–5817.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Klopocki E, Kristiansen G, Wild PJ, Klaman I, Castanos-Velez E, Singer G, Stöhr R, Simon R, Sauter G, Leibiger H, Essers L, Weber B, Hermann K, Rosenthal A, Hartmann A, Dahl E: Loss of SFRP1 is associated with breast cancer progression and poor prognosis in early stage tumors. Int J Oncol 2004, 25:641–649.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu C-C, Prior J, Piwnica-Worms D, Bu G: LRP6 overexpression defines a class of breast cancer subtype and is a target for therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010, 107:5136–5141.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jentsch S, McGrath JP, Varshavsky A: The yeast DNA repair gene RAD6 encodes a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. Nature 1987, 329:131–134.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shekhar MP, Gerard B, Pauley RJ, Williams BO, Tait L: Rad6B is a positive regulator of β-catenin stabilization. Cancer Res 2008, 68:1741–1750.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shekhar MP, Lyakhovich A, Visscher DW, Heng H, Kondrat N: Rad6 overexpression induces multinucleation, centrosome amplification, abnormal mitosis, aneuploidy, and transformation. Cancer Res 2002, 62:2115–2124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shekhar MP, Tait L, Gerard B: Essential role of T-Cell Factor/β-catenin in regulation of Rad6B: a potential mechanism for Rad6B overexpression in breast cancer cells. Mol Cancer Res 2006, 4:729–745.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brennan K, Gonzales-Sancho JM, Castelo-Soccio LA, Howe LR, Brown AMC: Truncated mutants of the putative Wnt receptor LRP6/Arrow can stabilize β-catenin independently of Frizzled proteins. Oncogene 2004, 23:4873–4884.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Metcalfe C, Mendoza-Topaz C, Mieszczanek J, Bienz M: Stability elements in the LRP6 cytoplasmic tail confer efficient signalling upon DIX-dependent polymerization. J Cell Sci 2010, 123:1588–1599.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shekhar MP, Tait L, Pauley RJ, Wu GS, Santner SJ, Nangia-Makker P, Shekhar V, Nassar H, Visscher DW, Heppner GH, Miller FR: Comedo-ductal carcinoma in situ: A paradoxical role for programmed cell death. Cancer Biol Ther 2008, 7:1774–1782.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bafico A, Liu G, Goldin L, Harris V, Aaronson SA: An autocrine mechanism for constitutive Wnt pathway activation in human cancer cells. Cancer Cell 2004, 6:497–506.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McEwen DG, Peifer M: Wnt signaling: The Naked truth? Curr Biol 2001, 11:R524-R526.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Davidson G, Wu W, Shen J, Bilic J, Fenger U, Stannek P, Glinka A, Niehrs C: Casein kinase 1γ couples Wnt receptor activation to cytoplasmic signal transduction. Nature 2005, 438:867–872.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zeng X, Tamai K, Doble B, Li S, Huang H, Habas R, Okamura H, Woodgett J, He X: A dual-kinase mechanism for Wnt co-receptor phosphorylation and activation. Nature 2005, 438:873–877.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zeng X, Huang H, Tamai K, Zhang X, Harada Y, Yokota C, Almeida K, Wang J, Doble B, Woodgett J, Wynshaw-Boris A, Hsieh JC, He X: Initiation of Wnt signalling: control of Wnt coreceptor Lrp6 phosphorylation/activation via frizzled, dishevelled and axin functions. Development 135:367–375.Google Scholar
- Piao S, Lee SH, Kim H, Yum S, Stamos JL, Xu Y, Lee SJ, Lee J, Oh S, Han JK, Park BJ, Weis WI, Ha NC: Direct inhibition of GSK3β by the phosphorylated cytoplasmic domain of LRP6 in Wnt/β-catenin signalling. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e4046.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu G, Huang H, Garcia Abreu J, He X: Inhibition of GSK3 phosphorylation of β-catenin via phosphorylated PPPSPXS motifs of Wnt coreceptor LRP6. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e4926.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cselenyi CS, Jernigan KK, Tahinci E, Thorne CA, Lee LA, Lee E: LRP6 transduces a canonical Wnt signal independently of Axin degradation by inhibiting GSK3's phosphorylation of β-catenin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105:8032–8037.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mi K, Dolan PJ, Johnson GV: The low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6 interacts with glycogen synthase kinase 3 and attenuates activity. J Biol Chem 2006, 281:4787–4794.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- MacDonald BT, Tamai K, He X: Wnt/β-catenin signalling: components, mechanisms, and diseases. Dev Cell 2009, 17:9–26.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Voulgari A, Pintzas A: Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer metastasis: mechanisms, markers and strategies to overcome drug resistance in the clinic. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009, 1796:75–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nieto MA: The snail superfamily of zinc-finger transcription factors. Nature Reviews Mol Cell Biol 2002, 3:155–166.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yook JI, Li XY, Ota I, Fearon ER, Weiss SJ: Wnt dependent regulation of the E-cadherin repressor snail. J Biol Chem 2005, 280:11740–11748.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Conacci-Sorrell M, Simcha I, Ben-Yedidia T, Blechman J, Savagner P, Ben-Ze'ev A: Autoregulation of E-cadherin expression by cadherin-cadherin interactions: the roles of beta-catenin signaling, Slug, and MAPK. J Cell Biol 2003, 163:847–857.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sommers CL, Byers SW, Thompson EW, Torri JA, Gelmann ER: Differentiation state and invasiveness of human breast cancer cell lines. Breast cancer Res & Treat 1994, 31:325–335.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ryo A, Nakamura M, Wulf G, Liou YC, Lu KP: Pin1 regulates turnover and subcellular localization of beta-catenin by inhibiting its interaction with APC. Nat Cell Biol 2001, 3:793–801.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chung GG, Zerkowski MP, Ocal IT, Dolled-Filhart M, Kang JY, Psyrri A, Camp RL, Rimm DL: beta-Catenin and p53 analyses of a breast carcinoma tissue microarray. Cancer 2004, 100:2084–2092.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Prasad CP, Gupta SD, Rath G, Ralhan R: Wnt signaling pathway in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: relationship between beta-catenin, disheveled and cyclin D1 expression. Oncology 2007, 73:112–117.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- DiMeo TA, Anderson K, Phadke P, Fan C, Perou CM, Naber S, Kuperwasser C: A novel lung metastasis signature links Wnt signaling with cancer cell self-renewal and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in basal-like breast cancer. Cancer Res 2009, 69:5364–5373.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang J, Li Y, Liu Q, Lu W, Bu G: Wnt signaling activation and mammary gland hyperplasia in MMTV-LRP6 transgenic mice: implication for breast cancer tumorigenesis. Oncogene 2010, 29:539–549.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ayyanan A, Civenni G, Ciarloni L, Morel C, Mueller N, Lefort K, Mandinova A, Raffoul W, Fiche M, Dotto GP, Brisken C: Increased Wnt signaling triggers oncogenic conversion of human breast epithelial cells by a Notch-dependent mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103:3799–3804.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wissmann C, Wild PJ, Kaiser S, Roepcke S, Stoehr R, Woenckhaus M, Kristiansen G, Hsieh JC, Hofstaedter F, Hartmann A, Knuechel R, Rosenthal A, Pilarsky C: WIF1, a component of the Wnt pathway, is down-regulated in prostate, breast, lung, and bladder cancer. J Pathol 2003, 201:204–212.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Finn RS, Dering J, Ginther C, Wilson CA, Glaspy P, Tchekmedyian N, Slamon DJ: Dasatinib, an orally active small molecule inhibitor of both the src and abl kinases, selectively inhibits growth of basal-type/"triple-negative" breast cancer cell lines growing in vitro. Breast Cancer Res & Treat 2007, 105:319–326.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thomas PA, Kirschmann DA, Cerhan JR, Folberg R, Seftor EA, Sellers TA, Hendrix MJ: Association between keratin and vimentin expression, malignant phenotype, and survival in post-menopausal breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 1999, 5:2698–26703.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laakso M, Tanner M, Nilsson J, Wiklund T, Erikstein B, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P, Malmström P, Wilking N, Bergh J, Isola J: Basoluminal carcinoma: a new biologically and prognostically distinct entity between basal and luminal breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2006, 12:4185–4191.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.