Open Access

Expression analyses of nuclear receptor genes in breast cancer cell lines exposed to soy phytoestrogens after BRCA2 knockdown by TaqMan Low-Density Array (TLDA)

Journal of Molecular Signaling20094:3

https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-2187-4-3

Received: 05 December 2008

Accepted: 14 May 2009

Published: 14 May 2009

Abstract

Background

Most of breast cancers are considered sporadic and modulation of the two major genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 expressions caused by tissue-specific somatic mutations lead to this pathology. The nutritional intake of phytoestrogens seems to reduce the risk of breast cancer and investigation of their potential as anticancer agents has increased. However, the possible mechanisms and signalling pathways of phytoestrogen action in breast cancer prevention remains unknown.

Results

Using Taqman Low Density Array technology, we investigated the BRCA2 loss of function role in sporadic breast cancers and the links existing with soy isoflavones on a panel of nuclear receptor expression. Human breast cell lines (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and MCF-10a) were transfected by BRCA2-siRNA and treated with genistein (18.5 μM) or daidzein (78.5 μM) for 72 h. Generating the transitory knockdown of BRCA2 oncosuppressor, we observed different modulations in several nuclear receptor genes such as ER, RAR and RXR, as well as PPARs and VDR according to the studied breast cell line. Additional isoflavone treatments showed different nuclear receptor gene modulation profiles.

Conclusion

Our results seemed to implicate the oncosuppressor BRCA2 and the phytoestrogen pathways in different nuclear gene expressions via an ER-independent manner.

Background

Breast cancer is an important public health problem worldwide. Most of breast cancers are considered sporadic, with only an estimated 5–10% due to inherited susceptibility [1]. Because BRCA1 and BRCA2 expressions are often decreased, or even absent in sporadic breast cancer, abnormal BRCA1 or BRCA2 expressions may also play a role in nonhereditary tumors [2, 3]. In sporadic cases, BRCA2 gene is rarely inactivated, but its expression is often modulated [4]. Although BRCA2 function is often restricted to DNA recombination and repair, evidence is accumulating that the silencing of this gene might be of particular importance in the pathogenesis of a significant proportion of sporadic breast cancers.

Moreover, most of breast cancers are considered estrogen-dependent, and estrogens are suggested to cause breast cancer by stimulating cell growth and proliferation through receptor-mediated processes and via their genotoxic metabolites [5, 6]. Phytoestrogens are a class of plant-derived substances that are structurally and/or functionally similar to 17β-estradiol (E2) [7]. Interest in phytoestrogens, more particularly soy, has been instigated by epidemiologic studies that have suggested a low incidence of breast cancer in Asian countries that have high soy intake [8, 9]. It has also been suggested that soy isoflavones may influence breast cancer risk via their anti-proliferative, anti-angiogenic, anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory properties, but the possible mechanisms of phytoestrogen actions in breast cancer prevention remained inconclusive.

Furthermore, nuclear receptors are transcriptional factors and play key roles in the regulation of gene expression and physiological activities [10]. To study this, we used RNA interference in breast human cells to down-regulate BRCA2 and determine its contribution to nuclear receptor expression at the transcriptional level. Two different human breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231) and a human fibrocystic breast cell line (MCF-10a) were transfected by a pool of BRCA2-siRNA. They were exposed to either genistein or daidzein for 72 h. A control group of non-treated cells was included in our study. Expression pattern of 64 nuclear receptor genes were investigated using the TaqMan Low-Density Array (TLDA) technique.

Methods

Cell culture

MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast tumor cell lines came from a pleural effusion of patients with invasive breast carcinoma [11, 12]. The MCF-10a cell line was established from breast tissue of patient with fibrocystic breast disease [13]. All three human cell lines were provided by the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). In our study, MCF-7 were cultured in RPMI 1640 media supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine (Invitrogen), 20 μg/ml gentamycin (Panpharma), 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen), 0,04 UI/ml insulin (Novo Nordisk) in a humidified atmosphere at 37°C containing 5% CO2. This cell line has a positive estrogen-receptor status (ERα+/ERβ+). MCF-10a cells were maintained in DMEM-F12 (Invitrogen) containing 10% horse serum (Invitrogen), 2 mM L-glutamine, 20 μg/ml gentamycin (Panpharma), 20 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (Sigma), 100 ng/ml cholera toxin (Sigma), 0,25 UI/ml insulin (Novo Nordisk) and 0,5 μg/ml hydrocortisone (Sigma) held at 37°C with 5% CO2. This cell line has a negative estrogen receptor status (ERα-/ERβ-). MDA-MB-231 cells were grown in Leibovitch L-15 media with 15% FBS, 20 μg/ml gentamycin (Panpharma), 2 mM L-glutamine in a 37°C humidified atmosphere without CO2. This cell line has a negative estrogen receptor status (ERα-/ERβ+).

Conditional BRCA2 loss of function using small interfering RNA (siRNA)

A pool of three target-specific 20–25 nt BRCA2-siRNAs was chemically synthesized. The siRNA sequences used for human BRCA2 were 5'-CCA AGG AUG UUC UGU CAA Att-3', 5'-CAA GCU ACA UAU UGC AGA Att-3', and 5'-GAA ACG GAC UUG CUA UUU Att-3' (sc-29825, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). For siRNA treatments, 40–60% subconfluent proliferating cells were transfected with 50 nM of siRNA using the siRNA transfection reagent (sc-29528, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, California, USA). Prior studies have established that under these conditions, none of the siRNA caused cytotoxicity based on cell morphology or proliferation. To obtain mRNA BRCA2 maximal inhibition, we carried out 72-h incubations with BRCA2-siRNA and quantification was performed by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR).

Phytoestrogen exposure

Isoflavone treatments were carried out for 72 h with 18.5 μM genistein or 78.5 μM daidzein dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma). These concentrations were previously obtained and corresponded to the 50% inhibition of the proliferation (IC50) [14]. As controls, cell lines were also conditioned in medium without siRNA transfection and without isoflavone treatments.

RNA extraction and reverse transcription

Total RNA was isolated from MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and MCF-10a treated cells and from control cells after 72 h. We used 1 ml RNA-PLUS (MP Biomedicals) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The RNA quality was checked by electrophoresis using a Bioanalyzer 2100 with RNA 6000 Nano LabChip® and BioSizing A.02.11 software (Agilent Technologies). Five micrograms of total RNA were reverse transcribed in a total volume of 15 μl using the First-Strand DNA Synthesis Kit and performed according to the manufacturer's protocol (Amersham Biosciences). Reverse transcriptase was thermically inactivated (95°C, 10 min).

BRCA2 knockdown analyses by quantitative real time RT-PCR

The resulting cDNA was then quantified with the TaqMan® method. PCR was carried out in 96-well plates: 25 ng of cDNA and 20 μl of reaction mix containing 12.5 μl TaqMan universal PCR Master Mix (Roche) (dATP, dCTP, dGTP and dUTP, MgCl2, AmpliTaqGold, Amperase uracil-N-glycosylase), 200 nM of TaqMan probes corresponding to the studied gene, 400 nM of each primer and 50 nM of 18S rRNA primers and TaqMan probe. Primers were as follows: BRCA2, forward: 5'-CCA AGT GGT CCA CCC CAA C-3', reverse: 5'-CAC AAT TAG GAG AAG ACA TCA GAA GC-3'; 18S, forward: 5'-CGG CTA CCA CAT CCA AGG AA-3', reverse: 5'-GCT GGA ATT ACC GCG GCT-3' (MWG). Taqman® probes were purchased from Applied Biosystems: BRCA2, 5'-ACT GTA CTT CAG GGC CGT ACA CTG CTC AAA-3' (FAM); 18S, 5'-TGC TGG CAC CAG ACT TGC CCT C-3' (VIC).

Data were collected using an ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detector System (Applied Biosystems) for 40 cycles (95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 1 min) after an initial step of 50°C for 2 min, 95°C for 10 min. The relative amount of BRCA2 mRNA to 18S rRNA was calculated as the average 2-ΔΔCt where ΔCT = Ct BRCA2 -Ct 18S with data normalized to untreated controls. Two independent total RNA extractions were performed as two independent reverse transcriptions with one of the RNA extractions. All data were generated in triplicate and expressed as mean +/- SD.

TaqMan Low Density Array (TLDA)

Predesigned TLDA called Human Nuclear Receptor Panel (64 TaqMan® Gene Expression assay preconfigured in a 384-well format, Part n° 4379968 microfluidic cards, Applied Biosystems), were used in a reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) process using the ABI Prism 7900 HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). The TLDA in this study was configured into 2 identical 64-gene sets in triplicate. A total of 100 μl reaction mixture with 50 μl cDNA template (100 ng) and an equal volume of TaqMan® universal master mix (Applied Biosystems) was added to each line of TLDA after gentle vortex mixing. Thermal cycler conditions were as follows: 2 min at 50°C, 10 min at 94.5°C and 30 s at 97°C, and 1 min at 59.7°C for 40 cycles. The threshold cycle Ct was automatically given by SDS2.2 software package (Applied Biosystems). Relative quantities (RQ) were determined using the equation: RQ = 2-ΔΔCt. All data were generated two times (different TLDA plates) in triplicate and expressed as mean +/- SD.

Results

Down-regulated expression of BRCA2 by RT-PCR

We down regulated the expression of BRCA2 by use of RNA interference, and quantification was performed by RT-qPCR in MCF 7, MCF-10a and MDA-MB-231 human breast cell lines under four conditions: 1) control, 2) siRNA-BRCA2, 3) siRNA-BRCA2 + genistein, and 4) siRNA-BRCA2 + daidzein. As shown in Figure 1, transfection of the three human breast cell lines treated with a pool of BRCA2-siRNA for 72 h significantly decreased the expression of BRCA2 mRNA compared with control cells.
Figure 1

Specific knockdown of BRCA2 mRNA expression measured by RT-qPCR in MCF-7, MCF-10a and MDA-MB-231 breast cell lines after BRCA2 -siRNA, BRCA2 -siRNA + daidzein, and BRCA2 -siRNA + genistein 72-h treatments in comparison to controls. The ΔΔCt method and normalization by comparison with controls were used. Values are means ± SD for n = 3 assays. Statistical analysis was carried out by Student t-test (*, P < 0.05; †, P < 0.01).

Nuclear receptor gene modulations by TLDA

Sixty-four genes (48 nuclear receptor genes and 16 endogenous controls) were successfully amplified two times in triplicate by TLDA in the four conditions described above.

Estrogen-receptor (ER) α and β expressions were analysed in the three human cell lines. In MCF-7 cell line, we observed a decreased expression of ERα and an over-expression of ERβ after BRCA2 knockdown, as well as after additional treatments of both genistein and daidzein. MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells showed a decreased expression of ERα and ERβ genes in all conditions. The fibrocystic MCF-10a cell line showed a down-regulation of ERα expression after BRCA2-siRNA transfection, but no significant modulations were observed under additional isoflavone treatments. No significant modulations were observed for ERβ expression which is not usually expressed (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Modulation in mRNA levels performed by TLDA for estrogen receptor genes ( ERα and ERβ ) with differential expression between BRCA2 -siRNA treatment and BRCA2 -siRNA with isoflavone exposure, compared to control cells corresponding to value 0, in MCF-7, MCF-10a and MDA-MB-231 cell lines. Values are means ± SD for n = 3 assays. Statistical analysis were carried out by Student t-test (†, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05).

Expression of thyroid-related receptors such as Thyroid hormone receptor α-1-like, REV-ERBA-α-related receptor, THR α-1, THR β-2, V-ERB-A avian erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog-like 2 was also modulated after BRCA2-siRNA treatment and the additional phytoestrogen treatments (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Modulations in mRNA levels performed by TLDA for thyroid hormone receptor-related genes ( Thyroid hormone receptor α-1-like, REV-ERBA-α-related receptor, THR α-1, THR β-2, V-ERB-A avian erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog-like 2 ) occurring after BRCA2 -siRNA treatment and BRCA2 -siRNA with isoflavone exposures, compared to control cells corresponding to value 0, in MCF-7, MCF-10a, and MDA-MB-231 cell lines. Values are means ± SD for n = 3 assays. Statistical analysis were carried out by Student t-test (†, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05).

We also observed modulation in retinoic acid-related receptors such as RARα, RARβ, RARγ, RXRα, and RXRβ after the different treatments (Figure 4).
Figure 4

Modulations in mRNA levels performed by TLDA for retinoic acid receptor-related genes ( RARα , RARβ , RAR γ, RXRα , and RXRβ ) occurring after BRCA2 -siRNA treatment and BRCA2 -siRNA with isoflavone exposure when compared to control cells corresponding to value 0, in MCF-7, MCF-10a, and MDA-MB-231 cell lines. Values are means ± SD for n = 3 assays. Statistical analysis were carried out by Student t-test (†, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05).

Liver X-related receptors (LXR) α and β expressions were not affected by BRCA2-siRNA transfection, except in MDA-MB-231. The hepatocyte nuclear factor (HNF) 4-γ expression was decreased after the both 72 hours treatments (Figure 5).
Figure 5

Modulation in mRNA levels performed by TLDA for liver receptor genes ( LXRα , LXRβ and HNF4γ ) with differential expression between BRCA2 -siRNA treatment and BRCA2 -siRNA with isoflavone exposure when compared to control cells corresponding to value 0, in MCF-7, MCF-10a, and MDA-MB-231 cell lines. Values are means ± SD for n = 3 assays. Statistical analysis were carried out by Student t-test (†, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05).

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARs) α, δ, and γ expressions were also found modulated after the different treatments (Figure 6).
Figure 6

Modulations in mRNA levels performed by TLDA for peroxisome-related receptor genes ( PPARα , PPARδ and PPARγ ) with differential expression between BRCA2 -siRNA treatment and BRCA2 -siRNA with isoflavone exposure when compared to control cells corresponding to value 0, in MCF-7, MCF-10a, and MDA-MB-231 cell lines. Values are means ± SD for n = 3 assays. Statistical analysis were carried out by Student t-test (†, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05).

Hormone receptors as glucocorticoid, aldosterone, growth factor and vitamin D receptors were studied and showed modulations in their expressions after siRNA-BRCA2 transfection and both genistein and daidzein exposures (Figure 7).
Figure 7

Modulations in mRNA levels performed by TLDA for hormone receptor genes ( Photoreceptor-specific nuclear receptor, Glucocorticoid receptor, Aldosterone receptor, Growth factor inducible nuclear protein N10 and Vitamin D receptor ) with differential expression between BRCA2 -siRNA treatment and BRCA2 -siRNA with isoflavone exposure when compared to control cells corresponding to value 0, in MCF-7, MCF-10a, and MDA-MB-231 cell lines. Values are means ± SD for n = 3 assays. Statistical analysis were carried out by Student t-test (†, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05).

Discussion

Epidemiological evidence suggests that consumption of soy products is inversely correlated with the incidence of certain types of cancers, including breast cancer. Genistein and daidzein, the main soy-associated isoflavones, are considered to be the most important components in soy and have been largely studied in the last years. The cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in these compound actions, however, are not fully understood. Isoflavones are structurally similar to endogenous estrogens of humans and have both estrogenic and antiestrogenic activities. Nuclear receptors are transcriptional factors that play important roles in gene expression regulation and physiological activities. Among these, receptors are sexual hormone receptors, including estrogen receptors (ER) which are critical in breast cancer. This is especially true since most of breast cancers are considered to be estrogen-dependent. Modulation of nuclear receptors seemed to be an important and possible mechanism through which isoflavone such as genistein and daidzein could act on physiological functions.

There is increasing evidence that the silencing of BRCA2 gene might be important in the pathogenesis of a significant proportion of sporadic breast cancers where this gene expression is often modulated [15]. To study this, we used RNA interference in breast human cells (MCF-7, MCF-10a, and MDA-MB-231) to down-regulate BRCA2 and determine its contribution to nuclear receptor expression at the transcriptional level. Genistein and daidzein 72 hours treatments were added to this transitory loss of function and the expression pattern of 64 nuclear receptor genes were investigated using the TaqMan Low-Density Array (TLDA) technique.

Two subtypes of ER (α and β) were identified and showed distinct tissue-specific distribution patterns. Isoflavones can bind to both ER subtypes due to their structural similarity to human endogenous estrogens. The ratio of ERα to ERβ is a prognostic marker in breast tumors, in that ERβ expression is indicative of more benign tumors, whereas ERα indicates malignant, aggressive tumors [16, 17]. The three different cell lines used in this study exhibited different ER status: MCF-7 (ERα+/ERβ+), MDA-MB-231 (ERα-/ERβ+), and MCF-10a (ERα-/ERβ-). Under the BRCA2 loss of condition function, we observed in MCF-7, a decreased expression of ERα and an increased expression of ERβ. Both genistein and daidzein treatments showed the same effects in this cell line. In MDA-MB-231 cell line under siRNA-BRCA2 and either siRNA-BRCA2 + genistein or daidzein, we observed a down-regulation of ERα and β. In MCF-10a, no expression modulation was observed for ERβ, and under-expression of ERα was observed under siRNA-BRCA2 condition. So, in the absence of BRCA2, the decreased expression of BRCA2 seemed to affect ERα mRNA expression in the three cell lines, whereas isoflavone treatments seemed to have no effect on ER expression.

The regulation of cell growth and differentiation of normal and malignant cells by retinoids is mediated by the retinoic acid receptors (RARs) and the retinoid × receptors (R×Rs). These are members of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily of transcription factors [18]. Most of known isotypes of RARs and RXRs are expressed in breast cells [19]. Yang & al, 1999 have shown that RARα expression is lower in normal breast cells and ER-negative breast cancer cells (MDA MB 231 and MDA MB 435), compared to ER-positive breast cancer cells (MCF7 and T47D) [20]. In our study, BRCA2 knockdown is associated with a decreased expression of RARα in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231. After genistein and daidzein 72-h exposures, we observed a restored expression of RARα in MCF-7, but this was not the case in MDA-MB-231 cells. This observation may be due to the different ER status exhibited by these two cell lines.

Moreover, loss of RARβ has been observed in solid tumor cells, including breast cancer [21]. This finding suggests that the specific loss of RARβ expression may be an important event during breast tumorigenesis. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that introduction of RARβ gene into breast cancer cell lines restored RA responsiveness to growth inhibition and induction of apoptosis [22]. Other reports have shown that RARβ RNA is expressed at low levels in normal and immortal breast cells, but it is absent in ER-positive breast cancer cells [23]. In our study, we observed the absence of RARβ described above in MCF-7 ER-positive cells. In MCF-10a, BRCA2 knockdown over-expressed RARβ when isoflavone treatments decreased its expression. In MDA-MB-231, we observed a general decreased expression of RARβ under the different treatments.

It has been reported that RARγ is expressed at similar low levels in normal mammary epithelial cells, immortal breast cells, and breast cancer [21]. In MCF-7 and MCF-10a, we observed an under-expression of RARγ after both BRCA2 knockdown and either genistein or daidzein treatments.

Thyroid hormone receptors (THRs) function as nuclear transcription factors to mediate thyroid hormone actions. They are key regulators of many genes involved in cholesterol and lipid metabolism. They also play important roles in controlling growth, differentiation, development, and carcinogenesis. THR are present in both breast tissue and in breast tumor tissue, although the involvement of these receptors in breast cancer is poorly understood, and their combined effects with estrogens are not well studied [24]. In a recent study, it have been suggested that thyroid hormones and their receptors play a role in breast cancer development and progression in promoting MCF-7 and T47-D cell proliferation, and increasing the effect of 17β-estradiol on cell proliferation [25]. In our study, different profiles were observed between the different cell lines and after the different treatments. Thyroid hormone receptor α-1-like, REV-ERBA-α-related receptor and THR α-1 were over-expressed in MCF-7 while they were under-expressed in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-10a. Furthermore, no modulation of phytoestrogen treatments was observed on BRCA2 knockdown effects.

The peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) belong to the nuclear hormone recptor family and play an important regulatory role in lipid metabolism and adipogenesis [26]. Three PPAR genes have been identified in mammalian species: PPARα, PPARβ/δ, and PPARγ [27]. Results of in vitro studies demonstrate that the soy isoflavones, particularly genistein and daidzein, were able to activate both PPARα- and PPARγ-mediated gene expressions [28]. Furthermore, genistein has been identified as a ligand of the PPARγ receptor [29]. On recent studies, activation of PPARs has been identified as an approach to induce differentiation and inhibit proliferation of cancer lines. In ERα-cell lines MDA-MB-231 and MCF-10a, we observed an under-expression of PPARα and PPARβ/δ after BRCA2 knockdown. It is interesting to note that the addition of genistein or daidzein treatment restored PPARα and PPARβ/δ expressions in MDA-MB-231. Daidzein treatment restored their expression in MCF-10a cells whereas genistein did not. In MCF-7, we observed a global over-expression of PPARα and PPARβ/δ and an under-expression of PPARγ as observed in MCF-10a. In MDA-MB-231, PPARγ were slightly over-expressed after BRCA2 knockdown. This increased after genistein or daidzein treatments. These observations suggested that isoflavone may modulate PPARs expression via ER-independent mechanisms.

1α,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3, the biologically active form of vitamin D that interacts with the vitamin D receptor (VDR), is a coordinate regulator of proliferation, differentiation, and survival of breast cancer cells [30]. On the basis of these findings, there has been considerable interest in the therapeutic use of VDR agonists in the treatment of breast cancer. Furthermore, studies with mice lacking VDRs have established that vitamin D participates in negative growth control of the normal mammary gland and that the disruption of VDR signaling is associated with accelerated mammary tumor development [31]. In MCF-7 and MCF-10a cells, we observed an over-expression of VDR after BRCA2 knockdown and genistein and daidzein treatments. In MDA-MB-231, we observed a decreased expression of VDR after BRCA2 knockdown which was reversed after isoflavone treatments.

In conclusion, generating the transitory knockdown of BRCA2 oncosuppressor, we observed in three cell lines different modulations in several nuclear receptor genes like ER, RAR and RXR, as well as PPARs, and VDR. Additional treatments of genistein and daidzein, the main soy isoflavones, showed the similar or the opposite nuclear receptor gene modulation profiles that we observed under BRCA2 knockdown in a cell line independent-manner. These results suggested that many of the modulations observed may implicate, either directly or indirectly, the oncosuppressor BRCA2 and an ER-independent cross-modulatory action of genistein and daidzein for several different receptors.

Abbreviations

ER: 

estrogen receptor

TLDA: 

TaqMan Low-Density Array

VDR: 

vitamin D receptor

PPARs: 

peroxisome proliferator activated receptors

THRs: 

Thyroid hormone receptors

LXR: 

Liver X-related receptors

RAR: 

retinoic acid-related receptors

Declarations

Acknowledgements

N. Rabiau is recipient of a grant "CIFRE" from Soluscience S.A., Saint-Beauzire, France. We thank "La ligue contre le Cancer, Comité d' Auvergne ". We thank Timothy Gunnels for faciliting the English translation.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Département d'Oncogénétique, Centre Jean Perrin, CBRV
(2)
Université d'Auvergne-CJP, EA 4233 Nutrition, Cancérogenèse et Thérapie anti-tumorale
(3)
biopôle Clermont-Limagne, Soluscience
(4)
Service de Médecine du Travail et des Pathologies Professionnelles, CHU

References

  1. Fackenthal JD, Olopade OI: Breast cancer risk associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 in diverse populations. Nat Rev Cancer 2007, 7:937–948.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bieche I, Nogues C, Lidereau R: Overexpression of BRCA2 gene in sporadic breast tumours. Oncogene 1999, 18:5232–5238.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Thompson ME, Jensen RA, Obermiller PS, Page DL, Holt JT: Decreased expression of BRCA1 accelerates growth and is often present during sporadic breast cancer progression. Nat Genet 1995, 9:444–450.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bieche I, Lidereau R: Increased level of exon 12 alternatively spliced BRCA2 transcripts in tumor breast tissue compared with normal tissue. Cancer Res 1999, 59:2546–2550.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cavalieri E, Chakravarti D, Guttenplan J, Hart E, Ingle J, et al.: Catechol estrogen quinones as initiators of breast and other human cancers: implications for biomarkers of susceptibility and cancer prevention. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006, 1766:63–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Yager JD, Liehr JG: Molecular mechanisms of estrogen carcinogenesis. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1996, 36:203–232.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Sirtori CR, Arnoldi A, Johnson SK: Phytoestrogens: end of a tale? Ann Med 2005, 37:423–438.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Wu AH, Koh WP, Wang R, Lee HP, Yu MC: Soy intake and breast cancer risk in Singapore Chinese Health Study. Br J Cancer 2008, 99:196–200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wu AH, Ziegler RG, Horn-Ross PL, Nomura AM, West DW, et al.: Tofu and risk of breast cancer in Asian-Americans. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1996, 5:901–906.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sun SY, Lotan R: Retinoids and their receptors in cancer development and chemoprevention. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2002, 41:41–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Soule HD, Vazguez J, Long A, Albert S, Brennan M: A human cell line from a pleural effusion derived from a breast carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 1973, 51:1409–1416.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cailleau R, Young R, Olive M, Reeves WJ Jr: Breast tumor cell lines from pleural effusions. J Natl Cancer Inst 1974, 53:661–674.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Soule HD, Maloney TM, Wolman SR, Peterson WD Jr, Brenz R, et al.: Isolation and characterization of a spontaneously immortalized human breast epithelial cell line, MCF-10. Cancer Res 1990, 50:6075–6086.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Vissac-Sabatier C, Bignon Y-J, Bernard-Gallon DJ: Effects of the Phytoestrogens Genistein and Daidzein on BRCA2 Tumor Suppressor Gene Expression in Breast Cell Lines. Nutr Cancer 2003, 45:247–255.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lancaster JM, Wooster R, Mangion J, Phelan CM, Cochran C, et al.: BRCA2 mutations in primary breast and ovarian cancers. Nat Genet 1996, 13:238–240.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Shaaban AM, O'Neill PA, Davies MP, Sibson R, West CR, et al.: Declining estrogen receptor-beta expression defines malignant progression of human breast neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol 2003, 27:1502–1512.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Balfe PJ, McCann AH, Welch HM, Kerin MJ: Estrogen receptor beta and breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004, 30:1043–1050.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Chambon P: A decade of molecular biology of retinoic acid receptors. Faseb J 1996, 10:940–954.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gudas LJ: Retinoids, retinoid-responsive genes, cell differentiation, and cancer. Cell Growth Differ 1992, 3:655–662.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Yang LM, Tin UC, Wu K, Brown P: Role of retinoid receptors in the prevention and treatment of breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 1999, 4:377–388.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Xu XC, Sneige N, Liu X, Nandagiri R, Lee JJ, et al.: Progressive decrease in nuclear retinoic acid receptor beta messenger RNA level during breast carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 1997, 57:4992–4996.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu Y, Lee MO, Wang HG, Li Y, Hashimoto Y, et al.: Retinoic acid receptor beta mediates the growth-inhibitory effect of retinoic acid by promoting apoptosis in human breast cancer cells. Mol Cell Biol 1996, 16:1138–1149.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Swisshelm K, Ryan K, Lee X, Tsou HC, Peacocke M, et al.: Down-regulation of retinoic acid receptor beta in mammary carcinoma cell lines and its up-regulation in senescing normal mammary epithelial cells. Cell Growth Differ 1994, 5:133–141.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Silva JM, Dominguez G, Gonzalez-Sancho JM, Garcia JM, Silva J, et al.: Expression of thyroid hormone receptor/erbA genes is altered in human breast cancer. Oncogene 2002, 21:4307–4316.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hall LC, Salazar EP, Kane SR, Liu N: Effects of thyroid hormones on human breast cancer cell proliferation. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2008, 109:57–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Spiegelman BM, Flier JS: Adipogenesis and obesity: rounding out the big picture. Cell 1996, 87:377–389.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Schoonjans K, Staels B, Auwerx J: The peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARS) and their effects on lipid metabolism and adipocyte differentiation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1996, 1302:93–109.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mezei O, Banz WJ, Steger RW, Peluso MR, Winters TA, et al.: Soy isoflavones exert antidiabetic and hypolipidemic effects through the PPAR pathways in obese Zucker rats and murine RAW 264.7 cells. J Nutr 2003, 133:1238–1243.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Dang ZC, Audinot V, Papapoulos SE, Boutin JA, Lowik CW: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) as a molecular target for the soy phytoestrogen genistein. J Biol Chem 2003, 278:962–967.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Welsh J, Wietzke JA, Zinser GM, Smyczek S, Romu S, et al.: Impact of the Vitamin D3 receptor on growth-regulatory pathways in mammary gland and breast cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2002, 83:85–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Welsh J: Vitamin D and breast cancer: insights from animal models. Am J Clin Nutr 2004, 80:1721S-1724S.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Satih et al. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement